jrothman
Active Member
- First Name
- Jonathan
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2025
- Threads
- 3
- Messages
- 35
- Reaction score
- 30
- Location
- Brooklyn, NY
- Vehicles
- Rivian R1S
- Thread starter
- #1
I had a used Gen 1 and traded up to a Gen 2 in June of this year. I love Rivian. I'm so glad I got the vehicle. I'm thankful that Rivian exists as an alternative to Tesla. And I feel so lucky that I was able to afford the switch. I'm a public school teacher, so I saved up quite a bit by working a bunch of after-school and summer school hours to pull it off.
However, I'm bummed that they require I subscribe to Connect+ in order to use my Apple Music and YouTube through their interface. I pay for subscriptions to both. And, up until August, I would connect to my phone's hotspot to use both services through their interface - no problem.
I should include that I switched from Tesla to Rivian. You could use Tesla's interface for music, podcast and video streaming apps so long as you either paid for Tesla's data plan or used your own hotspot. Which makes perfect sense. Data costs. I'm not expecting or asking Tesla or Rivian to take a hit on music streaming data. That's why I take the time to connect to my phone's hotspot when I get in the car.
Since the development of the app interface is essentially a sunk cost with nominal updates while data is the real cost, I don't understand why Rivian expects their customers to pay for that aspect of things if I provide the hotspot. It's akin to requiring us to pay for use of the radio station tuner - another app that they develop and maintain but has no data costs associated with using the app.
It should be said that using their interface makes for a much safer driving experience as opposed to taking out and using your phone. Something I know that Rivian takes so, so seriously.
For a company that is so gracious in so many ways, pay-walling the music streaming interfaces is... a letdown. One that starts off as an, "Oh, well," but only becomes more of a bummer over time. Every time I have to pick up my phone - or use Siri - to switch songs/albums/playlists, I find myself asking why. And it doesn't make more sense as time goes on.
I don't know if I'm in the minority here, but I'm really hoping that Rivian is hearing this message from others. And I'm really hoping that they'll change their minds. I understand why others would pay for it, but simply I don't need the other features that come with Connect+. And I can't help but think that this wasn't their intention. They are so gracious in so many ways - so hopefully they'll reconsider this aspect of using the car's entertainment features.
However, I'm bummed that they require I subscribe to Connect+ in order to use my Apple Music and YouTube through their interface. I pay for subscriptions to both. And, up until August, I would connect to my phone's hotspot to use both services through their interface - no problem.
I should include that I switched from Tesla to Rivian. You could use Tesla's interface for music, podcast and video streaming apps so long as you either paid for Tesla's data plan or used your own hotspot. Which makes perfect sense. Data costs. I'm not expecting or asking Tesla or Rivian to take a hit on music streaming data. That's why I take the time to connect to my phone's hotspot when I get in the car.
Since the development of the app interface is essentially a sunk cost with nominal updates while data is the real cost, I don't understand why Rivian expects their customers to pay for that aspect of things if I provide the hotspot. It's akin to requiring us to pay for use of the radio station tuner - another app that they develop and maintain but has no data costs associated with using the app.
It should be said that using their interface makes for a much safer driving experience as opposed to taking out and using your phone. Something I know that Rivian takes so, so seriously.
For a company that is so gracious in so many ways, pay-walling the music streaming interfaces is... a letdown. One that starts off as an, "Oh, well," but only becomes more of a bummer over time. Every time I have to pick up my phone - or use Siri - to switch songs/albums/playlists, I find myself asking why. And it doesn't make more sense as time goes on.
I don't know if I'm in the minority here, but I'm really hoping that Rivian is hearing this message from others. And I'm really hoping that they'll change their minds. I understand why others would pay for it, but simply I don't need the other features that come with Connect+. And I can't help but think that this wasn't their intention. They are so gracious in so many ways - so hopefully they'll reconsider this aspect of using the car's entertainment features.
Sponsored