CD is just a function of shape. It doesn't measure total air resistance. There's other factors, a big one is size: if you shrink an object down, it has the same CD but less air resistance.
You should sign up on Rivian Roamer and see what it says about your battery health. Your R1S is probably fine. You want to see close to 130 kWh usable capacity on the battery. If so, it is fine. As others have said, this configuration is EPA rated in the 270-280 miles range, but that 248 number...
Yeah I'm having trouble seeing the target demographic here. Someone who loves R1 but not enough to buy one yet, just waiting months or years in case Rivian produces the right color for them.
I'm very interested for real-world range tests to come out. No matter what the EPA says, I still can't believe the R2 will come close to aerodynamic and smaller designs like Model Y. It might be that they're close under 60 mph but R2 gets much worse at 75+. We'll see.
Instead of vague terms like luxury and quality, what actually matters to you? Are you talking about how the seats feel or what?
By my standards, R2 interior is +2 more quality than R1 because it has +2 glove boxes.
Cars are made to crumple in the front not rear. There are pictures around this forum where a car or truck rear-ended a standard Rivian and the Rivian looks almost untouched while the other car is smashed in.
Ok, you want to charge at 500 kW for the entire charging curve. It'll be years if not decades until battery technology and charging stations can do that.
I personally agree with you but millions of people don't. Rivian doesn't either. If they only sell to people who actually want a high-clearance SUV they won't hit their numbers.
Looks that way to me too. Unless you want the R2 to do something the iX3 can't do in terms of storage or off roading, or you want the cheaper model R2.