Search results

Wow. Good research. Chopping 5 kWh off the top of the pack is exactly what it looked like for me and I hypothesized happened earlier in this thread. You mentioned a gen 2 “large” having 141 kWh previously but I think you mean Max (as you mentioned elsewhere in your post)

Looking forward to seeing Kyle re-test this.

If it changed the mileage/efficiency estimate, you would expect it to show a different range number for the same SoC (77%). Whereas here my available range remained exactly the same yet the SoC went up (80%). The battery voltage wouldn’t have changed at all (it was parked for hours) yet now that...

I saw something similar with this .47 update: Two week old R1S Tri Max with AT package. Was 497 km at 100%. At the time of the update it was at 387 km / 77%. When it finished installing and rebooted it said the same 387 km but now says 80% instead of 77%. Theoretical 100% charge is now 479 km...

Would be nice to have YouTube on the middle row screen for the kids too

Do we think Rivian might improve the gen 2 charge curve over time? Maybe they will find a bit more heat is OK and they can bump the charge rate up 10 or 20%?

I would like to see more seat configurations for the R1S. I like the vehicle, but as a family of 3 we have basically no need for the third row. I see it as a negative because even keeping it folded down it still consumes space and makes the cargo area not level. I would love to see a 5 seat...