Search results

My 14 yo dog, who has spent many a night in a back country tent in her long life, wants to know where Rivian camping has been all her life.

Finally had a chance to take the S camping this weekend, since we bought her back in December. Couldn't beat the view!

Thanks! Got the tire replaced yesterday at Discount, thankfully for only 50 bucks (I got the tires only in December). She's good as new. PS I love your name

We have similar avatars, lol

On the Rollins Pass Road? I've actually never driven that one but I've heard it isn't bad. The Rivian will surprise you how capable it is - ground clearance/approach angles are 90 percent of what you need.

No this is Upper Gold Camp Road outside the Springs. I've driven that road a few times though as well :)

Railroad grades make great hiking trails! Such low grades

I posted this a couple days ago on Reddit, but also wanted to share here. I was out hiking in the mountains Saturday, and had to drive in to the trailhead on a long road that was a railroad up until about 100 years ago. Got back to the R1 after the hike and found a giant railroad spike in the...

So this is how they got the "more than 300 miles" number. Pretty disappointing.

This makes a lot of sense. I thought it seemed almost impossible for the R2 to hit those kinds of numbers.

I was reading on Reddit that these are just the sub-tests and need corrections applied still.

These are insane numbers and I don't know how it's possible. Bravo Rivian

I of course know the R2 will be more efficient. But given the efficiency numbers of other EVs out there (such as Tesla, BMW), it seems like that number will be hard to achieve in real world.

I'm still skeptical of the 3.7 as a realistic real-world number. My R1S (Quad Large Gen1) is rated at about 2.45 mi/kWh EPA. That's definitely achievable at highway speeds in the right conditions, but I don't think the R2 could come close to that at highway. It seems to set owners up for...

Well it's not really "real-world" because range doesn't matter to most people in those situations. It only matters in highway driving (i.e. long trips)

Kind of what I figured. Makes me happy I went with a used R1S for $65k.

Oh I know. I just meant that 3.75 will probably never be achieved in real world driving unfortunately.

BMW is known to massively underrate specs, but my i4 was always around or a little less than EPA.

3.75 mi/kWh seems high, no? No way it will be able to get that at highway speeds.

The question is why the Service Center is saying not to. You would think they would know, right?