Search results

What kind of efficiency numbers are you seeing?

That’s really disappointing to hear. I wonder why efficiency is so poor relatively.

B rating is UTQG. I get 2.1 ish on my stock 34” AT’s so I’m hoping to get more for the sake of longer trips. H rated shouldn’t mean much since the cars are top speed limited. Most of my driving is around town so not a big deal otherwise. The defenders are better looking IMO

Defenders are my second choice but they’re B traction rated and Rivian Tracker shows 2.1mi/kwh efficiency which is a lot lower than the grabbers. What efficiency have you been seeing? They’re priced pretty well

Could you post a few pics of them? I’m assuming you went 70 width? Mine is a commuter car that will tow a few times a year to the lake.

Thanks for the input. To be fair I did address treadwear. Regarding UTQG; tread wear numbers are only reliable within a specific brand since it’s a self reported metric. Beyond that the grabbers are A traction rated and B temp rated (up to 115mph).

I need tire’s for my 20’s. Prioritizing efficiency. The General Grabber HTS 60 is tops on Rivian Tracker (https://riviantrackr.com/rivian-tire-guide/?size=275%2F60R20&sort=efficiencyGrade) and here...

bump. will all seasons on the 20” wheel be just as efficient as all seasons on the 22”?