Sponsored

Bad Leasing and Delivery Experience

portdirect

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2023
Threads
16
Messages
928
Reaction score
1,372
Location
Missouri
Vehicles
R1T (2023 QM - RIP, 2025 Tri Max), R1S (2024 DM Large)
Occupation
Blinkenlight Hearder
Here’s a copypasta of a post I did about this previously. Note that the ranges shown in the displays match the EPA certified numbers - there is no adjustment made based on driving history etc (the button to ‘reset’ does nothing other than provide a timestamp for monitoring - confirmed by Rivian).

What Drive Mode Corresponds to the Advertised 371-Mile Range?
In short—none.

According to Rivian’s own testing and submissions to the EPA:

  • All-Purpose (AP) Mode: ~346 miles
  • Conserve Mode: ~395 miles
Yet, Rivian promotes a 371-mile “EPA” range figure. This number appears to result from mixing data from different drive modes: applying AP mode efficiency for highway driving (45% weighting) and Conserve mode efficiency for city driving (55% weighting). This methodology is entirely backward and not standard practice for EPA ratings.

By blending results from two distinct modes, Rivian achieves a more appealing—but less transparent—range estimate. However, this figure cannot be directly compared to any other EV on the U.S. market, as no other automaker takes this approach. Despite this, Rivian submitted the 371-mile figure to Fuel Economy for inclusion on the Monroney label.

Is This Misleading?
Technically, EPA guidelines sometimes allow multi-mode testing, meaning Rivian may not be violating explicit rules. However, this approach only holds up if Rivian can convince the EPA that the majority of drivers actually use Conserve mode in city driving and AP mode on the highway (which is highly questionable).

As a result, R1 owners and reviewers frequently ask why no drive mode actually displays “371 miles” on the dashboard—leading to repeated attempts to rationalize the discrepancy - like Marques did in the video here. This raises concerns about transparent reporting of electric vehicle range and how automakers can “game the system” by merging results from multiple modes to produce a more attractive but less realistic number.

This practice isn’t an apples-to-apples comparison with other EVs and makes it difficult for consumers to accurately assess real-world range expectations.

The Problem Becomes Worse When Executives Make Misleading Statements
This situation shifts from creative marketing to borderline deception when statements like the following are made publicly:

Transcript from Sandy Munro’s Interview with RJ Scaringe (Rivian CEO)
Sandy: so what's the range on this one here with the tri motor and stuff like that
RJ: so with the tri in um on the EPA test it's 371 miles EPA certified number yeah and to get that number we actually have to test it with uh essentially with all-wheel drive locked because we wanted to have it such that if you put in the uh normal mode the front L axles are both on if you go into conserve mode on this which has uh Dynamic uh rear disconnect so it goes on and off in conserve mode it does around 400 miles but the EPA number is 371 and that's different than our dual motors where we we actually have the dynamic rear disconnect always engaging or disengaging and the reason for that with the tribe we wanted to be able to lock so it's always immediately there full performance at all times even when you're in all-purpose mode so it's a decision we made to trade off a little bit on Range the EPA range but it's still 371 miles but I I'm driving one I I regularly get 400ish miles uh just by you know having it in conserve mode and and the neat thing about conserve mode on this is you can access both it's all wheel drive it's just all wheel drive on demand so the rear axle comes to life when you need it.

The Certification Process—Or Lack Thereof
Notably, Rivian has not yet been audited for the 2025 R1 values they submitted, and without pressure likely never will be, meaning the certification is currently just a rubber-stamp approval.

Also, notice that RJ never explicitly states that the 371-mile figure corresponds to AP mode—yet, given all the information above, it’s understandable why most people would assume that an EPA cycle would produce a 371-mile range in AP mode. That assumption, however, is simply incorrect.

#RangeGate?
Oh, I know some people won’t like that… ?


Edit: for 2026 Rivian claimed the following ranges for the TriMax to the EPA:

Tire SizeModeMiles
22” SportAP346.10
22” SportConserve395.64
20” ATAP308.44

So the good news is @Wooly you are not missing miles on your R1 - they were never there on anyones. I don't understand why none of the media or any influencer has picked this up - they are ALL aware of this.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

portdirect

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2023
Threads
16
Messages
928
Reaction score
1,372
Location
Missouri
Vehicles
R1T (2023 QM - RIP, 2025 Tri Max), R1S (2024 DM Large)
Occupation
Blinkenlight Hearder
Just curious.

How did you determine rated range was 346 at delivery? Where did you see that number? Photo?
It’s displayed everywhere within the R1, the epa range for AP mode is 346 miles, not 371 as marketing would make you believe.
 

portdirect

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2023
Threads
16
Messages
928
Reaction score
1,372
Location
Missouri
Vehicles
R1T (2023 QM - RIP, 2025 Tri Max), R1S (2024 DM Large)
Occupation
Blinkenlight Hearder
Mine is also 346 in all purpose mode at full charge. It is 371 at full charge in conserve mode. I believe the stated 371 miles is base strictly on conserve mode.
It’s based on a blend of modes as best we can make out rather than being for any one mode.
 
OP
OP

Wooly

Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2025
Threads
2
Messages
16
Reaction score
18
Location
Southwest
Vehicles
R1S
Here’s a copypasta of a post I did about this previously. Note that the ranges shown in the displays match the EPA certified numbers - there is no adjustment made based on driving history etc (the button to ‘reset’ does nothing other than provide a timestamp for monitoring - confirmed by Rivian).

What Drive Mode Corresponds to the Advertised 371-Mile Range?
In short—none.

According to Rivian’s own testing and submissions to the EPA:

  • All-Purpose (AP) Mode: ~346 miles
  • Conserve Mode: ~395 miles
Yet, Rivian promotes a 371-mile “EPA” range figure. This number appears to result from mixing data from different drive modes: applying AP mode efficiency for highway driving (45% weighting) and Conserve mode efficiency for city driving (55% weighting). This methodology is entirely backward and not standard practice for EPA ratings.

By blending results from two distinct modes, Rivian achieves a more appealing—but less transparent—range estimate. However, this figure cannot be directly compared to any other EV on the U.S. market, as no other automaker takes this approach. Despite this, Rivian submitted the 371-mile figure to Fuel Economy for inclusion on the Monroney label.

Is This Misleading?
Technically, EPA guidelines sometimes allow multi-mode testing, meaning Rivian may not be violating explicit rules. However, this approach only holds up if Rivian can convince the EPA that the majority of drivers actually use Conserve mode in city driving and AP mode on the highway (which is highly questionable).

As a result, R1 owners and reviewers frequently ask why no drive mode actually displays “371 miles” on the dashboard—leading to repeated attempts to rationalize the discrepancy - like Marques did in the video here. This raises concerns about transparent reporting of electric vehicle range and how automakers can “game the system” by merging results from multiple modes to produce a more attractive but less realistic number.

This practice isn’t an apples-to-apples comparison with other EVs and makes it difficult for consumers to accurately assess real-world range expectations.

The Problem Becomes Worse When Executives Make Misleading Statements
This situation shifts from creative marketing to borderline deception when statements like the following are made publicly:

Transcript from Sandy Munro’s Interview with RJ Scaringe (Rivian CEO)
Sandy: so what's the range on this one here with the tri motor and stuff like that
RJ: so with the tri in um on the EPA test it's 371 miles EPA certified number yeah and to get that number we actually have to test it with uh essentially with all-wheel drive locked because we wanted to have it such that if you put in the uh normal mode the front L axles are both on if you go into conserve mode on this which has uh Dynamic uh rear disconnect so it goes on and off in conserve mode it does around 400 miles but the EPA number is 371 and that's different than our dual motors where we we actually have the dynamic rear disconnect always engaging or disengaging and the reason for that with the tribe we wanted to be able to lock so it's always immediately there full performance at all times even when you're in all-purpose mode so it's a decision we made to trade off a little bit on Range the EPA range but it's still 371 miles but I I'm driving one I I regularly get 400ish miles uh just by you know having it in conserve mode and and the neat thing about conserve mode on this is you can access both it's all wheel drive it's just all wheel drive on demand so the rear axle comes to life when you need it.

The Certification Process—Or Lack Thereof
Notably, Rivian has not yet been audited for the 2025 R1 values they submitted, and without pressure likely never will be, meaning the certification is currently just a rubber-stamp approval.

Also, notice that RJ never explicitly states that the 371-mile figure corresponds to AP mode—yet, given all the information above, it’s understandable why most people would assume that an EPA cycle would produce a 371-mile range in AP mode. That assumption, however, is simply incorrect.

#RangeGate?
Oh, I know some people won’t like that… ?


Edit: for 2026 Rivian claimed the following ranges for the TriMax to the EPA:

Tire SizeModeMiles
22” SportAP346.10
22” SportConserve395.64
20” ATAP308.44

So the good news is @Wooly you are not missing miles on your R1 - they were never there on anyones. I don't understand why none of the media or any influencer has picked this up - they are ALL aware of this.
That’s great info and I really appreciate your detailed accurate analysis. Thank you. As you said I’m shocked someone in the press hasn’t picked up on this. There claims are deceptive at a minimum and really bordering on consumer fraud. I’m amazed that they wouldn’t get called to the carpet on this practice by the EPA.
It’s also interesting that in “conserve“ mode to the EPA they claim the R1S gets 395 miles of range, but in their marketing they have pushed that number above the magical 400 mile number and actually claim 405 miles of range. So while that doesn’t help my range any, it at least clears up what is actually going on here. Well done @portdirect
 
Last edited:

Cascadian

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Apr 19, 2023
Threads
12
Messages
327
Reaction score
323
Location
Seattle
Vehicles
Volt, Outback
Clubs
 
It’s displayed everywhere within the R1, the epa range for AP mode is 346 miles, not 371 as marketing would make you believe.
I posed that question to prompt clarity to the post. It worked and you provided the explanation to Wooly. Thank you.

I could not answer like you because I only know how my 2023 Quad R1S works.
 

Sponsored

Scoiatael

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2021
Threads
49
Messages
1,162
Reaction score
1,816
Location
Southern CA
Vehicles
2025 R1S, 2024 Mach E
I think in general, the 100% range number is going to be less. The only exception is Large+ packs like my Dual Motor R1S has. It will charge past 100% into the "extra" battery cells so it can display 330 miles of range at 100%.

This isn't a Rivian issue either. My F150 Lightning used to be about 20-30 miles lower at full charge than advertised. Tesla might do this as well, its been a while since I had one, but they just lie I feel like for the range.
 

portdirect

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2023
Threads
16
Messages
928
Reaction score
1,372
Location
Missouri
Vehicles
R1T (2023 QM - RIP, 2025 Tri Max), R1S (2024 DM Large)
Occupation
Blinkenlight Hearder
I think in general, the 100% range number is going to be less. The only exception is Large+ packs like my Dual Motor R1S has. It will charge past 100% into the "extra" battery cells so it can display 330 miles of range at 100%.

This isn't a Rivian issue either. My F150 Lightning used to be about 20-30 miles lower at full charge than advertised. Tesla might do this as well, its been a while since I had one, but they just lie I feel like for the range.
I wish you were correct, but unfortunately Rivians dont work like that. Does your range show 330 miles at 100%? If so that’s because like every other Rivian they don’t actually (as of yet) do anything other than effectively multiply the SOC by a number to make it match the estimated range (EPA when published, in house when not) for that battery/drive mode combo. Fords etc all use the averaged out real world usage to provide their guess-o-meter, Rivian's are just EPA cycle estimate displays - which really sucks, as the Rivian's nav system is clearly using real world data to come up with its range calc and is generally really good.

We won't find a single person on here (I'm sure, and will eat humble pie if proven wrong) that has anything other than the same numbers provided by the system for a particular battery/motor/wheel/tyre combination on their Rivian. Which for this thread is 346 miles for a TriMax (T or S) with 22" wheels and stock tires - regardless of how new/old or driven etc.

Edit: my issue here is just the highly misleading way Rivian market these things - they know they are playing games, and cant even keep the story straight at the C suite level for what they are doing. And I think they are playing it worse than others - using your example of Ford, they publish the EPA number for an ACTUAL drive mode you as a customer can use - not either a special one that was produced for testing only, or a blended one of multiple drive modes. With a Ford or dual motor Rivian, you should be able to reproduce the test cycle and get the same result they did - I don't think thats possible with a Tri Motor Rivian (presumably the quad as well).
 
Last edited:

McLovin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2024
Threads
7
Messages
508
Reaction score
1,153
Location
Virginia
Vehicles
R1T
Clubs
 
For people complaining about the range... have ever owned a car before? I mean, seriously...

My wife's A5 is "rated" at "24 city/33 highway/ 27 combined". I've done numerous trips over the past 2 years where it's strictly highway driving, and can tell you we get 33 MPG maybe if we've got a tailwind and the road is flat.

It's a 15 gallon tank. If I'm averaging 30 MPG, that will get me 450 miles on a full tank, NOT the "advertised" 495 miles on a full tank.

OH MY GOD!!!! IT'S FRAUD!!!! THEY SHOULD BE SUED!!!!!

Give me break. Welcome to real world. It's been like this since...forever.
 

nyckkr

Active Member
First Name
A
Joined
Aug 17, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
33
Reaction score
27
Location
Tri-state
Vehicles
2023 Quad R1S, 2025 R1S Tri (replaced 2023 R1T Quad)
For people complaining about the range... have ever owned a car before? I mean, seriously...

My wife's A5 is "rated" at "24 city/33 highway/ 27 combined". I've done numerous trips over the past 2 years where it's strictly highway driving, and can tell you we get 33 MPG maybe if we've got a tailwind and the road is flat.

It's a 15 gallon tank. If I'm averaging 30 MPG, that will get me 450 miles on a full tank, NOT the "advertised" 495 miles on a full tank.

OH MY GOD!!!! IT'S FRAUD!!!! THEY SHOULD BE SUED!!!!!

Give me break. Welcome to real world. It's been like this since...forever.
apples and oranges.

In any case, Gen 1 range was on target as specified. Jury is out on gen 2. it's underperforming significantly.
 

Hereforthesnacks

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2024
Threads
3
Messages
1,232
Reaction score
1,460
Location
West Coast
Vehicles
Ford Bronco
For people complaining about the range... have ever owned a car before? I mean, seriously...

My wife's A5 is "rated" at "24 city/33 highway/ 27 combined". I've done numerous trips over the past 2 years where it's strictly highway driving, and can tell you we get 33 MPG maybe if we've got a tailwind and the road is flat.

It's a 15 gallon tank. If I'm averaging 30 MPG, that will get me 450 miles on a full tank, NOT the "advertised" 495 miles on a full tank.

OH MY GOD!!!! IT'S FRAUD!!!! THEY SHOULD BE SUED!!!!!

Give me break. Welcome to real world. It's been like this since...forever.
My Pilot was advertised at 18 city/26 highway/21 combined. That’s what it gets over 75k miles.

My Bronco was advertised 17/17/17. That’s what it gets over 15k miles.

My EV9 was advertised as 270mi per charge. That’s what it gets over 17k miles.

Now, my Bolt was advertised at 238mi per charge, but I usually got about 200.

I also had a 2013 Passat diesel, but screw them and dieselgate. Though it did get 45 mpg lol
Sponsored

 
 








Top