Announcing our new "CLUBS" section where you can join or create a Rivian club or group! You can use this new feature to conveniently plan and discuss local events, gatherings or other club/group related topics.
So we encourage you to join (or start) special-interest and regional-based Rivian clubs at: https://www.rivianforums.com/forum/group-categories/clubs-groups.1/
Munro only ever cares about cost. I remember watching their videos on the Rivian and the only conclusion I ever reached by watching them is "too good, let's save 3 cents by making it worse". It was nice seeing the internal pieces of the Rivian when they did tear downs but I also worried that they will come in and make it worse. I just hope RJ has enough common sense not to let them screw it up too much with their suggestions.Munro missed out on a lot of the innovation in GM's pack. There is a significant amount of stuff done for preventing thermal runaway, lessons learned from the Bolt program. It looks wasteful but it's actually very important IMO.
They also make no mention of the wireless communications which saves a significant amount of copper and wiring intrapack.
I don't think there are many changes inside the pack, most of the changes were to fix sealing issues.Have a Hummer EV (or had now). This was a v1 pack. They are on v3 now.
I got as far as the presenter (Tesla fan?) saying GM could even be lying to their investors (0:36) and had to stop. Someone who seems to love Tesla, a company which seems to have no problem with what I'll generously call exaggerations, going after another company because they could do the same in the future is someone I can't take seriously.Here's an annotated version that says the quiet part out loud.
Not always. Remember Sandy recommended adding a 2nd motor to the power tonneau to prevent the problems we’ve been seeing. He rightly felt Rivian “cheaped out” on the design."too good, let's save 3 cents by making it worse"