Sponsored

V2V, V2H, V2X - what's the holdup? Where are the deets?

Jerm

Active Member
First Name
Jeremy
Joined
Jan 15, 2023
Threads
5
Messages
28
Reaction score
31
Location
Illinois
Vehicles
R1T
Occupation
Systems Engineer
Getting tired of looking at social media posts of dead battery EVs on the road with a portable generator attached to mock them... not sure why people feel compelled to video any EV that runs out of fuel but not ICE, but it is true that it would be quite unpleasant.
Would love to start seeing videos of one EV transferring power to another at a high rate (V2V) instead someday to start countering that caveat with a capability.

In any case, I don't even have the details yet on how it would work. I have so many questions. Straight up DC I assume, but how fast? Does it slow if charge levels aren't far apart? Possible to charge past equalization point? Or maybe I've got that all wrong and there's an inverter(s) involved?

I hear so much about products out there, and I understand V2G may see regulatory delays, but I don't know what's holding back V2H or V2V. Is Rivian going to offer a bi-directional charger, V2V cables, etc? What's the plan and when will it happen?
Sponsored

 

Lizardo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2022
Threads
27
Messages
710
Reaction score
477
Location
TX
Vehicles
R1T
Occupation
Self
Clubs
 
Honestly, its probably not a big priority for them. As much as I'd love it as well.

I think continued improvements to drive, user experience, safety are probably bigger software priorities at this point
 
OP
OP

Jerm

Active Member
First Name
Jeremy
Joined
Jan 15, 2023
Threads
5
Messages
28
Reaction score
31
Location
Illinois
Vehicles
R1T
Occupation
Systems Engineer
I'm truly hoping that those are separately allocated teams in the software space. If software or other feature efforts within Rivian were that serialized, we've got much worse problems. I'm optimistic that that is not the case though, and the plan just hasn't been shared effectively.
 

SACDFJC

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2019
Threads
16
Messages
445
Reaction score
658
Location
CA
Vehicles
FJ40
Is there a big enough use case here to warrant the investment? FOr me, I doubt I would ever do V2V. Initially I wanted V2H, but after the power went out this past winter I ran 2 extension cords (1 to the fridge, 1 to lights) and got by I'm not even interested in anything more than what I have now. IMO, I'd rather have the EV Charging companies focus every single bit of resources on expanding and making the charging experience better.
 

Dark-Fx

Well-Known Member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Threads
98
Messages
9,617
Reaction score
18,379
Location
Michigan
Vehicles
Polestar 2, R1T, R1S, Livewire One, Fisker Ocean
Occupation
Engineering
Clubs
 
CCS spec for V2X is still very new, there's nothing commercially available right now that follows the specification.
 

Sponsored

OP
OP

Jerm

Active Member
First Name
Jeremy
Joined
Jan 15, 2023
Threads
5
Messages
28
Reaction score
31
Location
Illinois
Vehicles
R1T
Occupation
Systems Engineer
Yes- it absolutely is a big enough use case, even if not to you individually. Look at Ford sprinting ahead in this area.
Ford Power-on-board also made huge sales headlines for them during the Texas winter power outage a couple years back. As a stockholder and an R1T owner, I'm interested in Rivian succeeding here.
Especially worth the focus if there's a chance Rivian can be first to market with a differentiating feature like V2H. For anyone rural who frequently spend $10-15k on a home standby generator, this potentially weighs that much in price advantage favor for an EV. (any EV that does this)
For the EV that is the first and only, for however long that lasts, that's a huge deal. It's an extraordinarily good rationale in the calculus some people have to work to shell out the big bucks for an EV, particularly a Rivian.
 

teddyang

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ted
Joined
Jun 16, 2022
Threads
22
Messages
250
Reaction score
565
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Vehicles
R1T Adeventure Edition, RB, BM, 21"
Clubs
 
Is there a big enough use case here to warrant the investment? FOr me, I doubt I would ever do V2V. Initially I wanted V2H, but after the power went out this past winter I ran 2 extension cords (1 to the fridge, 1 to lights) and got by I'm not even interested in anything more than what I have now. IMO, I'd rather have the EV Charging companies focus every single bit of resources on expanding and making the charging experience better.
https://cleantechnica.com/2023/05/08/california-ponders-v2g-mandate/

I think that makes a compelling reason to be up and running and ready to go....
 
OP
OP

Jerm

Active Member
First Name
Jeremy
Joined
Jan 15, 2023
Threads
5
Messages
28
Reaction score
31
Location
Illinois
Vehicles
R1T
Occupation
Systems Engineer

SANZC02

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bob
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Threads
30
Messages
5,328
Reaction score
8,984
Location
California
Vehicles
Tesla Model S, LE - R1S
Occupation
Retired
Yes- it absolutely is a big enough use case, even if not to you individually. Look at Ford sprinting ahead in this area.
Ford Power-on-board also made huge sales headlines for them during the Texas winter power outage a couple years back. As a stockholder and an R1T owner, I'm interested in Rivian succeeding here.
Especially worth the focus if there's a chance Rivian can be first to market with a differentiating feature like V2H. For anyone rural who frequently spend $10-15k on a home standby generator, this potentially weighs that much in price advantage favor for an EV. (any EV that does this)
For the EV that is the first and only, for however long that lasts, that's a huge deal. It's an extraordinarily good rationale in the calculus some people have to work to shell out the big bucks for an EV, particularly a Rivian.
I may look at V2H if Rivian implements it but just for reference that 10 to 15k you reference is mostly for the permitting and required electrical infrastructure required for the home to get that in place. Most guesstimates I have seen to install a bidirectional charger with the required grid cutoff will still set people back 5 or 10k.

If having backup power is important the benefit of the vehicle is the amount of power that would be available but for me I installed a power-wall with my solar system.
 

Sponsored

Seartrip

Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
9
Reaction score
20
Location
NJ
Vehicles
R1T
Just a thought. Creating standards for V2V across manufacturers is difficult, but it would be cool if Rivian enabled a V2V capability for its vehicles, and then via the app allowed people to opt-in to a user-supported emergency charge capability. Meaning if your batteries ran too low, you could request an emergency charge from another Rivian owner, and they could meet you and give you enough charge to get to a real charger. As more Rivians get on the road this has increasing benefit. Rivian owners helping Rivian owners, essentially.

Just an idea.
 
OP
OP

Jerm

Active Member
First Name
Jeremy
Joined
Jan 15, 2023
Threads
5
Messages
28
Reaction score
31
Location
Illinois
Vehicles
R1T
Occupation
Systems Engineer
I may look at V2H if Rivian implements it but just for reference that 10 to 15k you reference is mostly for the permitting and required electrical infrastructure required for the home to get that in place. Most guesstimates I have seen to install a bidirectional charger with the required grid cutoff will still set people back 5 or 10k.

If having backup power is important the benefit of the vehicle is the amount of power that would be available but for me I installed a power-wall with my solar system.
I've priced them, and you're not wrong about the extra cost for generator hookups. However, there is significantly less infrastructure to put in place for connecting a bidirectional charger and ATS that would reduce the relative cost. No propane lines (assuming propane fueled), outdoor concrete pad, lines, etc, periodic servicing, etc. And after that, the generator itself running $5k - $7k to start is the budget left for a bidirectional charger and associated hookups. I don't expect it to be anywhere near that.
Powerwall would be ideal and stays home when the vehicle is gone, but otherwise it doesn't compare in cost effectiveness. I tried running those numbers and it doesn't pencil out.
Ford's bidirectional charger is $1300ish I think, but I expect an ATS would have to be added as well, which wouldn't be nothing. I want a generator, but am holding off in anticipation of being able to V2H instead and double duty on that EV investment.
 

teddyang

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ted
Joined
Jun 16, 2022
Threads
22
Messages
250
Reaction score
565
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Vehicles
R1T Adeventure Edition, RB, BM, 21"
Clubs
 
Tell me if i'm crazy or my math is off but a powerwall is about ~$10k for 1 powerwall that has 13.5 kwh. A Rivian (and F-150 lightning for that matter) has 135 kwh of energy. The equivalent in powerwalls would be $100k. So if i had V2H for the same cost why wouldn't i just just buy a second vehicle as my fulltime battery backup?
 

Jimi

Active Member
First Name
Jimi
Joined
Sep 5, 2021
Threads
10
Messages
43
Reaction score
36
Location
93422
Vehicles
Volvo XC90 T8
Occupation
CEO
I totally agree. Rivian has assured us their vehicles are bi-directional compliant, but where is the hardware? My R1S is supposed to arrive by year's end so I have emailed every V2h/V2V/V2G manufacturer to get info, pricing, etc. No one has responded. My garage is 240 wired from a prior vehicle and I have robust solar capacity. But where is the hardware!!! I think powerwalls are over priced-over rated, especially given the potential for bi-directional service with an EBV.
 

Ralph

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ralph
Joined
Jun 14, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
623
Reaction score
634
Location
Arkansas
Vehicles
R1T, Outback
  • Like
Reactions: VSG
 




Top