- Banned
- #76
Great job.![]()
![]()
You won't believe this, but I got a straight answer out of CS. Looks like some handcuffs are off them! Sweeeeeet. More details on those other options in the near future too.
Sponsored
Great job.![]()
![]()
You won't believe this, but I got a straight answer out of CS. Looks like some handcuffs are off them! Sweeeeeet. More details on those other options in the near future too.
Looks like my point 3 has already been answered:I thought 314 miles was great, until I saw the "10-15% reduction for the 20" all-terrains". That definitely makes me think about my choice to have those on my config.
A few questions/thoughts remain though for me:
Regardless, I just want over 300 miles usable real-world so I'm happy I'm going for the Max Pack.
- How does the "Conserve" drive mode (which shuts off 2 of the 4 motors) affect things?
- Do we think 314 is actually an underestimate, similar to Mach-E and Taycan's EPA estimates? Or an overestimate like all of Tesla's EPA estimates? We'll need people to run road trip tests to find out
- I'm interested to see if they can improve this over time with software updates. My guess is yes, definitely.
- I noticed they said specifically "Launch Edition" in their post. Wonder why? Would non-LE be expected to have different range? I wouldn't think there'd be any difference, but maybe they're thinking they're going to get rated again by the EPA for non-LE models based on any efficiency improvements they're planning.
I'm going to assume this is w/out the off-road upgrade package (tow hooks and additional reinforced underbody shielding)
Hopefully software updates/increasing the range will keep up with the battery degradation losses.This was exactly what I was expecting, so I don’t see why some people seem so surprised. This is a great range for the wheel/tire combinations. I’m sticking with my 20 inch wheels with the ATs, and if I ever need more range for some reason, that sounds like two wheel mode will help with some range. I bet you with software updates and calibrations will have increased range over the life of the car as well.
I could always buy a second set of tires with less aggressive treads on them, it might even beat the 21 or 22 inch ones
Generally when the EPA tests a vehicle, they test the standard mode, which in the R1T's case would be 4 motor drive. I bet you'll see a lot more range from 2WD.The 30 mile hit on 20’s kinda hurts.
Also, do we know if this 314 is based on the truck being AWD or are they using the newly discovered 2WD conserve power mode?
That right.Yikes, 10-15% loss of range on the 20" wheels. That means on a cold day we could be talking under 200 miles real range highway.
I know Rivian is marketing to off-road enthusiasts as that sells. I've looked at the R1T from the beginning when I first saw it as a sports truck with 4 motors, kinetic suspension, many of their team are from McLaren. Remember, RJ loves Porsche's since his youth. RJ has also stated he was driving a Porsche Cayenne for a long time as a comparison during R1T development. I started thinking about the 20" wheels after the reviews from Duck and others, but I think the 22's will be great on road. I'm in NC, so no real fear of snow, just need to be good in the rain. Just my opinion.I get that and agree. It’s just i see a lot of buyers here who talk about off roading. Max pack required in my opinion.
Max Pack + 2wd Mode + 21's = Road Trip ?That's actually really welcome news - I mean I'd go 2wd to eke out some extra miles if need be, so it's really good to hear that the testing was on quad motors.
Edit: good call on the potential 2wd + 20s theory for the MT review. Hey, if that's what it takes to get us to the magical 300 mile mark, I think that's totally fair. And if range is really super-important to you, then max out with 2wd on the 21s!
I forgot...I've been Max pack since the beginning. Remember, Max use to be Large, and Large was Middle. It's all marketing.I get that and agree. It’s just i see a lot of buyers here who talk about off roading. Max pack required in my opinion.
I don’t think that is right, considering regenerative braking. The effect of drag on efficiency increases by velocity squared. From most to least efficient it would be city driving without any stopping, city driving with stop and go, then highway constant speed.I was just told by Tesla that city stop and go uses way more energy than a constant freeway driving. I have found this to be true as well.
Here's a good article: https://www.caranddriver.com/featur...-factor-tesla-uses-for-big-epa-range-numbers/If it is EPA results, can you explain how Tesla could inflate those number? TIA
Maybe they are altering their software/battery available for the tests?