Nope, I just carry a puncture repair kit but, in the interest of full disclosure, I donāt do any serious off-roading. When Iām on a road trip my vehicle is fully packed so if I donāt have room for a full-sized spare then I donāt have room for a full-sized flat either.
Just upgraded to 2026.15.0 on my ā23 Gen 1 DM R1T but I donāt remember ever experiencing what you describe. I have experienced the āklunkā when accelerating and Iām hoping that goes away with this new release.
The Violent Femmes had the perfect response in Kiss Off:
[Verse 2]
I hope you know that this will go down on your permanent record
Oh, yeah?
Well, don't get so distressed
Did I happen to mention that I'm impressed?
Interesting. In stop & go traffic (or in the mountains) I would expect the heavier trailer to have lower efficiency but at freeway speeds I would expect the box trailer to have lower efficiency.
I agree with 3 of the 4 but Iāve found that elevation makes a huge difference. We routinely tow our 28ā AS over the Cascades and climbing drops our mi/kWh to 0.5 while, of course, we gain range coming back down but nowhere near enough to offset the energy used climbing.
I beg to differ. I use my 2023 R1T to drag my 28ā AS up and down the west coast with a range somewhere between 120-160 miles depending on the terrain. During these extended road trips the most important factor, for me, is the number of trailer-friendly SuperChargerās. My wife & I like to stop...
We just finished up our annual pilgrimage from Bend to the wine countries of Temecula and Paso Robles with our 23 R1T DM and C3X. A trip of just over 2,000 miles towing our AS, with the great majority on I-5 and the 101. Itās still my opinion that the C3X is far superior to Rivianās current...
As in life, there are few absolutes when towing a trailer.
When Iām towing my AS on a flat freeway @ 75mph, emptying the water tanks makes no noticeable dfference in range but dropping to 55mph makes a huge difference.
When towing up to my campground with a 4000ā elevation change on a curvy...