20" Inch GY WRANGLER TERRITORY AT (RIV) | 275/60R20 - 116H - 580AB - 3PMSF (Style: Blackwall Alternate Design 3)

[ksurfier]

I just noticed how many weights to balance the rear left wheel, this normal?

Sponsored

 

[ksurfier]

Update: After 8,000 miles the tread is wearing at a reasonable rate, this set should likely get 25,000 to 30,000 miles total (unless the wear rate increases in the summer, which is likely). The efficiency over 8,000 miles is 2.35 MPK.

 

[ksurfier]

Rotated tires at 9k, should have rotated at 7k…

 

[nsuglerio]

Update: After 8,000 miles the tread is wearing at a reasonable rate, this set should likely get 25,000 to 30,000 miles total (unless the wear rate increases in the summer, which is likely). The efficiency over 8,000 miles is 2.35 MPK.

Just had a rotation done at 10k miles with the same tires and the tech said they look great and should last up to 25k too. It's wild how awesome these are for being the "cheapest" option.

 

[ksurfier]

12.5k update

Efficiency has reached 2.38 MPK after 12,500 miles

my overall picks:
#1 - Geolandar CV 4S 33” for handling and ride comfort
#2 - Goodyear OEM 33” almost on par with CV 4S
#3 - 34” OEM Pirelli - terrible ride

Will likely try the General HTS 60 next, or maybe the Michelins, or maybe the Hankooks…so many choices

 

[ETNLandCruiser]

Rotated tires at 9k, should have rotated at 7k…

What are you seeing on front vs rear wear? I just did my first rotation at 7,500 miles and fronts were at 6/32 while rears are at 9/32. I usually drive in all purpose but maybe I should be using sport more often.

 

[2kwik4u]

12.5k update

Efficiency has reached 2.38 MPK after 12,500 miles

my overall picks:
#1 - Geolandar CV 4S 33” for handling and ride comfort
#2 - Goodyear OEM 33” almost on par with CV 4S
#3 - 34” OEM Pirelli - terrible ride

Will likely try the General HTS 60 next, or maybe the Michelins, or maybe the Hankooks…so many choices

I have the GY OEM 33". They aren't bad, but aren't exceptional either.

I think I'm going to try the Continental Terrain Contact A/T's on the next round. Had those on my Sierra and really liked them. Been a Continental fan for years.

 

[ksurfier]

What are you seeing on front vs rear wear? I just did my first rotation at 7,500 miles and fronts were at 6/32 while rears are at 9/32. I usually drive in all purpose but maybe I should be using sport more often.

I track wear in the first post here, I think I got 8.6 v 10.1, so about 1.5/32” delta…yours seems to extreme, maybe it’s 6.5 v 8.5? While decent tires, I’d like to try out some others before revisiting.

 

[ksurfier]

I have the GY OEM 33". They aren't bad, but aren't exceptional either.

I think I'm going to try the Continental Terrain Contact A/T's on the next round. Had those on my Sierra and really liked them. Been a Continental fan for years.

I think as long as you pick a tire that’s 40# plus/minus 5# you csnt go wrong, just get what you want and call it good!

 

[ksurfier]

15,000 mile update:
Tire wear is fairly even at nearly 6/32 fronts and rears, final rotation will likely be ~18,000 miles. I don’t expect to get more than 22,000 miles total (at the maximum).

These are great tires, would get them again.

 

[UnsungZero_OldTimeAdMan]

15,000 mile update:
Tire wear is fairly even at nearly 6/32 fronts and rears, final rotation will likely be ~18,000 miles. I don’t expect to get more than 22,000 miles total (at the maximum).

These are great tires, would get them again.

Very curious how the same size BFG TT T/A+ compares.

 

[ksurfier]

Very curious how the same size BFG TT T/A+ compares.

Unless I'm missing something, those are 116T (not H), also 48#.
If you don't need an AT setup, then my two top replacement choices are, key difference being the Yokohamas (13/32nds) are 3PMSF and the Generals (10/32ndds) are not:

 

[UnsungZero_OldTimeAdMan]

Unless I'm missing something, those are 116T (not H), also 48#.
If you don't need an AT setup, then my two top replacement choices are, key difference being the Yokohamas (13/32nds) are 3PMSF and the Generals (10/32ndds) are not:

T is 118 mph. R1 gen1 quad is software limited to 110 mph. And I didn't buy this truck to do top speed runs on the German Autobahn every single day. The only spec that holds significance to me is the load rating. And the $280 XL BFG checks that box. Yes, it's 2 lbs heavier than the larger 275/65 Scorpion AT, but it's also a smaller diameter and potentially tougher. Speculation of course. The Yoko and the General just don't look good to me.

Sponsored