Search results

Of course not, Gen 1 is essential abandonware at this time.

You may need to go through the recalibration process for the seat and steering wheel.

It's a good thing for Rivian that I was never contacted to participate in the survey then.

You'll need the Gen3 to get this feature...

Wow you took "vastly easier to implement" to "easier for you to use." Posters on this forum seem to have a hard time actually reading what people type. Yes, it is vastly easier to implement PIN to drive than MFA. Whether you think one is easier to use versus the other is a different discussion...

No, you mentioned 80%. It's funny that you only reference 40% SOC as ideal as you know the Rivian begins to drop around that time. What you want to ignore is that most people are charging more than 40% on road trips, especially if they follow the built-in navigation. The "argument" is one...

I disagree, no one has said to hit a DC Charger and charge to 80%+ every time - no one. You keep adding your own context to what others have typed.

For those that are happy with MFA, great I am happy for you. For the rest of us, even if we are in the minority, why NOT implement PIN to drive? It would be vastly easier than MFA. Why not give the user the choice?

Why do you keep bringing up Tesla 150kW chargers? There a plenty of other chargers that limit to 150kW, that is what we have been discussing. Yes if you only charge to 40% then you may charge faster than someone on a 150kW charger unless your thermals are bad your Rivian de-rates your speeds.

What you missed, or maybe wasn't explained well enough... If you hit up a charger and hit the max charge of 220kW on a Rivian, due to heat it will derate to a lower charging speed than a 150kW charger will. So you charger longer, at higher charging rates on a 150kW than at 220kW. Out of Spec...

Tech just left. He put the truck into service mode, ran a calibration test and the issue was resolved for me.

The same issue happened a few months back with my driver's side rear window; got a mobile tech coming out today to look at it. Calibration process did not resolve it for me.

You can believe what you want, that is your prerogative.

No I don't remember the name. If you go and look at the video it is in there, funny enough the youtuber now claims the video was not sponsored... after all of the backlash. I don't believe the guy for a second after watching what he was doing. The LiDAR company was there, with one of their...

First off it wasn't FSD. He tried to engage autopilot, a very old build at that. This video was sponsored by a LiDAR company. Don't believe everything you see/read on the internet.

1. They weren’t using FSD. 2. They disengaged autopilot before getting to the wall, watch the video. 3. This video was sponsored by a LIDAR company.

No. I never claimed the SUV driver lost control, my previous post was entirely in jest which you missed. You just don't want to admit the obvious, which is fine. The OP can chime in, as he should have more details, and we can see whom is closer to the truth. I already know the answer to that...

And the moon might have been a quarter full in the age of Aquarius igniting swamp gas that emitted a localized discharge causing the SUV driver to lose control.....

Where was the SUVs attempt to slow /stop for a red light? While the speed limit could be 50, I doubt it in a city setting. Either way that SUV was going much faster than 50. Just look at the distance it covers from the start of the vid until impact in a short amount of time.

While you can say the Prius made an illegal lane change, crossing the solid white line, the SUV was at fault. They were coming at a high rate of speed to an intersection where all of the vehicles were stopped at a light. Had he not hit the Prius he would have blown through a red light. If the...