Either way, why buy a CT for $100k when they will be available a whole lot less in a few months? I don't think that they will sell for $80k a year from now.
With the shortest range, CT is a hard sell right now. The tech is very neat but not enough to overlook the small battery. Definitely something for everyone.
Ditto. Rivian fits my use case better as I don't need a huge bed, I like the gear tunnel, my PTC works, and I like the smaller size better. With the impending access to Tesla SC, my R1T will be perfect. Now, if 2 years from now Tesla increases the battery on the CT, I will revisit the issue.
Actually battery is smaller on CT by 12 KWh. It's less aerodynamic and bigger. Tires are bigger (35" vs 34").
It's frankly fairly efficient considering the above. It just needs a bigger battery.
Very nice. I like TMC forum approach where we discuss new RAN in their own thread. The title follows a format and changes as SC goes through stages (permit, construction, live).
See here: https://teslamotorsclub.com/tmc/forums/california-supercharger-locations.148/
On a road trip to Sedona, I averaged 2.0 driving 80-85 on freeway and normally in town. Truck was loaded with stuff and people. Drove in Conserve on the freeway. Quad, AT tires.
I own EVs for their ease of use, performance, lower CO2 emissions and as a bonus I love the idea of not funding middle east theocracies. Now I don't tow so easier to live without an ICE vehicle.