Search results

Guess I'll stick with the Pirelli then. Noise doesn't bug me and mine have 17k miles

Assuming that range rating for standard+ and large pack use the same methodology/derating coefficient, it should be about a 120KWh battery. $6k price reduction for less than $2500 reduction in battery cost seems odd. I am wondering if they're playing games with the EPA range like they did with...

Makes sense. It's only 11-12% less capacity than the large pack

We got an R1T at pre price hike and that was a great deal. At current price, QM and large pack are a stiff premium. DM and standard+ are going to be the configuration that everyone gets. With NACS, that's most likely our Tesla replacement.

Holly crap, that's a $3k price increase for large and max. Max is now wildly overpriced.

Was perusing Rivian site looking at lease prices and just discovered this. Good summary by @MidnightRivian ? Rivian R1S base price dropped to $74,900 for Adventure Package. The configurator now includes a 315 mile battery pack called Standard+ for $3,100. Now you can configure one with 315+...

300 miles, dual motor at $50k would be nice. That is most likely a stretch. SUV will be less aero than an equivalent model Y, and therefore will require more batteries. Would buy one at $60K with 100KWh batteries that can go over 300 miles at hwy speed. Also guessing that off-road...

Anyone pass by Groveland on their way to Yosemite lately? It was announced 18 months ago.

As batteries improve, the number of use cases for hydrogen will decrease in transportation. Solid state batteries will happen at some point

Hydrogen overall energy efficiency from production to motoring a car is a fraction of BEVs. Plus, I highly doubt that people want to have an explosive hydrogen refueling station in their midst. Not gonna happen. Why BMW is chasing this is weird. Anyway, not buying a Tesla so that one...

Pretty clear that it was a bit rushed out the door. It'll be interesting to see how it evolves over the next couple years

Taycan gen 2 is going to be the road trip king, provided that it can find the right chargers.

Good for him if it's true, in which case he should really do whatever he wants.

Why would he? His income increases with length of videos.

Cameras do suck. That's annoying

Actually I think it's next to the Whoa Nellie Deli place which is great. It's only open from April to October though.

I believe that utilities provide the transformer.

I believe that the exception is if the owner knows that tree is sick and doesn't deal with it. Seems like it would tough to prove

My understanding, from a neighbor who lost his car to a fallen tree, is that full coverage covers tree damage. Furthermore, tree owner is not responsible for the damage.

What is the root of the issue? The lack of negotiations or that shareholders were misled? If misled, how was that misleading? Too lazy to read the judge decision. Package is only huge in retrospect. Back then, almost no one expected most of those milestones to be met.