harveybl
Member
- First Name
- Brandon
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2022
- Threads
- 1
- Messages
- 8
- Reaction score
- 1
- Location
- Grand Prairie Texas
- Vehicles
- 2022 Rivian R1T
- Thread starter
- #1
Apologies if this has been covered but finding exact info has been hard.
I just switched to the defenders 275/60r20 tires. So now I am at the 33” diameter instead of 34.1”. This generates a higher mileage on vehicle for resell and warranty issues, not to mention speed and efficiency display.
what seems like people have done is get service center to switch to the 21” configuration since it aligns with total tire diameter.
They are going to do it but with heavy push back saying that their systems calculate it by rim size not tire with a sensor on rim and tire diameter. That this could cause a fault by it being a different rim size.
my question is has anyone else done this? Has it created a better speed and mileage reporting and efficiency reporting? Any faults or other issues doing the system config change?
Or should I not get them to do it.
also, does having the 33” tire on 20” rims if you don’t get the config changed, does it show a higher mi/kwh then what it should? Thought process is that if this means that if the speedometer is showing 60mph but due to smaller diameter you are actually going 58 mph which also means truck thinks you did more miles than actually traveled, that the efficiency on screens will report a higher mi/kwh?
which if true, the multiple threads of people reporting a gain of 20%+ by going to the M/S2 compared to AT tires could be due to the configuration not being changed?
I just switched to the defenders 275/60r20 tires. So now I am at the 33” diameter instead of 34.1”. This generates a higher mileage on vehicle for resell and warranty issues, not to mention speed and efficiency display.
what seems like people have done is get service center to switch to the 21” configuration since it aligns with total tire diameter.
They are going to do it but with heavy push back saying that their systems calculate it by rim size not tire with a sensor on rim and tire diameter. That this could cause a fault by it being a different rim size.
my question is has anyone else done this? Has it created a better speed and mileage reporting and efficiency reporting? Any faults or other issues doing the system config change?
Or should I not get them to do it.
also, does having the 33” tire on 20” rims if you don’t get the config changed, does it show a higher mi/kwh then what it should? Thought process is that if this means that if the speedometer is showing 60mph but due to smaller diameter you are actually going 58 mph which also means truck thinks you did more miles than actually traveled, that the efficiency on screens will report a higher mi/kwh?
which if true, the multiple threads of people reporting a gain of 20%+ by going to the M/S2 compared to AT tires could be due to the configuration not being changed?
Sponsored
Last edited: