R1Sky Business
Well-Known Member
Are we done with this "case"???
Sponsored
You asked for opinions by making the thread. My opinion is valid and has a historical basis behind it. I’m sorry you don’t like it, but the dismissive reply is unnecessary.Good for you, Don.
as someone who has traveled extensively in Vietnam, I can attest it a lot more developed and "modern" than plenty of places I've been in the good 'ol US of A. No more reason to avoid Vinfast than to avoid the 98% of items on walmart shelves made in the PRC.If the quality of USSR automobiles is any predictor of communist made autos I’m going to go ahead and take a hard pass on Vinfast.
I agree on being circumspect of the battery rental and that is, IMHO, the main reason to avoid vinfast. I am not sure what market niche it thinks this biz model appeals to.IDK, I'm a little bit leery of the battery rental mode of business. So you can purchase the vehicle outright for $42K then rent the battery for $170/month or purchase the vehicle for $42Kand then purchase the battery for an additional $13K?
So.. $55K for a vehicle with 180mi EV range? Sounds like BMW i3 crazy high pricing from back in the day (which everyone agreed was waaaay overpriced).
And, that $13K pricetag for the battery is just an assumption by Motor trend.... it could end up being higher. The sales rep MT spoke with said "tack on $20K if you want to purchase the battery".I agree on being circumspect of the battery rental and that is, IMHO, the main reason to avoid vinfast. I am not sure what market niche it thinks this biz model appeals to.
What about the open mind....If the quality of USSR automobiles is any predictor of communist made autos I’m going to go ahead and take a hard pass on Vinfast.