FromBostonSouth
Member
- First Name
- Bryan
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2024
- Threads
- 1
- Messages
- 13
- Reaction score
- 18
- Location
- Boston, MA
- Vehicles
- R1T
- Occupation
- Real Estate
- Thread starter
- #61
My grain: this is fantastic and exactly what they needed! I came across this IRC and received confirmation today from appeals office that this is what they needed! For all those out there getting denied based on AGI, what my grain posted is the information your appeal should state, quote, cite, and reference. Thank you!My initial (smart-a$$) reaction is that you won't find specific language in the law that says " ... and there is no restriction for taxpayer's modified adjusted gross income." Nor will you find specific language stating no restriction based on eye color at birth .... or whether your mother was a vegan during the tax year ... etc., etc. If the law doesn't say such-and-such is a restriction, can't we reasonably conclude that such-and-such is not a restriction?
I'll try to be more helpful. Let's look at the letter of the law. The MAGI requirements in the IRA are in Section 30D(f) Special Rules. Specifically, the requirements are in rule #10 Limitation based on modified adjusted gross income.
In the actual letter of the law, prior to the language for rule #10, is this sentence: "(f) SPECIAL RULES.—Section 30D(f) is amended by adding at the end the following:" After that sentence are rules #8, #9, and #10. (Wait .... so rules 1 through 7 must be in some prior legislation, right? Keep reading.) If you want to read the actual law, it is available here (IRA -- the whole thing). To find the Special Rules sub-section, scroll down to PDF page 141. The top of the page is labeled "136 STAT. 1957" .
The fact that they added a rule with limitations on MAGI implies that there was previously (prior to the IRA) no rule with MAGI requirements.
But let's dig deeper. Let's look at the letter of the law prior to the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. Public law 111-5, also known as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, contained amendments to Section 30D. We'll look at section 1141, CREDIT FOR NEW QUALIFIED PLUG-IN ELECTRIC DRIVE MOTOR VEHICLES. Here, in the 2009 legislation, you'll find sub-section (f) with Special Rules 1 through 7. Rule #1) BASIS REDUCTION. Rule #2) NO DOUBLE BENEFIT. Rule #3) PROPERTY USED BY TAX-EXEMPT ENTITY. Etc., etc. There is nothing in the 7 Special Rules contained in the 2009 law that addresses taxpayer MAGI. So ... can't we reasonably conclude that there was no restriction on income??? The complete text of the 2009 law is here (public law 111-5 ... the whole thing). To find the sub-section on Special Rules, scroll down to the very bottom of PDF page 213 ... the page is labeled "123 STAT. 327".
That's my best effort to find the "smoking gun" your IRS agent is apparently seeking.
Sponsored