Tesla nefarious behavior?

[Donald Stanfield]

That seems like something you made up, again. I've not seen any of that at all. There's no need to defend a person over a car, to start with, and nobody has yet proven the cars are a death trap. In fact, there's a lot of evidence to the contrary (but also not claiming that evidence is accurate or definitive). Your derangement seems to make it impossible to separate the car from the man. I bought a Tesla despite Musk being an idiot, no effect on the decision.

Also 2 of the top 5 most fatalities vehicles is the definition of death trap. You realize a death trap is a car that lots of people die in right? Well, two of the worst offenders are Teslas.

Sponsored

 

[Donald Stanfield]

Find one quote defending him, and I still have the $100 with your name on it.

This one. By constantly arguing and shilling for Musk and Tesla you’re defending him and his company. That’s what defending someone is.

 

[JM.]

This one. By constantly arguing and shilling for Musk and Tesla you’re defending him and his company. That’s what defending someone is.

I've done neither. You need to find a new LSD vendor. And the car and the man are still two different things.

 

[Donald Stanfield]

I've done neither. You need to find a new LSD vendor. And the car and the man are still two different things.

Your comment history here disagrees with you. Keep shilling for Tesla, you've almost got us convinced.

 

[JM.]

Your comment history here disagrees with you.

You mean what you've made up and ascribed to me. You still haven't quoted the BS you made up to claim your free money.

 

[Donald Stanfield]

You mean what you've made up and ascribed to me. You still haven't quoted the BS you made up to claim your free money.

Complaining about lack of proof doesn't mean a whole lot coming from you, considering you haven't provided a single source for anything you've said in any conversation we've ever had.

 

[JM.]

you haven't provided a single source for anything you've said in any conversation we've ever had.

That's false also. Do you actually have a tenuous grasp on reality or just trolling?

 

[Donald Stanfield]

That's false also. Do you actually have a tenuous grasp on reality or just trolling?

What source did you post?

 

[JM.]

I've posted a number for various conversations. So I guess that answers it? Selective memory?

 

[CrazyOne]

At this point, everyone who will ever agree that Tesla AP/FSD is severely flawed, already thinks so. The rest will never agree, no matter the evidence.

One of many: https://apnews.com/article/tesla-fu...5a44d2d9637f?utm_source=copy&utm_medium=share

 

[JM.]

I don't recall anyone saying that it's flawless. What we all know is that it's better than the more-flawed meatbag drivers and improving every day.

 

[Riviot]

What we all know is that it's better than the more-flawed meatbag drivers

On average, statistics says no.

 

[Donald Stanfield]

I've posted a number for various conversations. So I guess that answers it? Selective memory?

I don't recall anyone saying that it's flawless. What we all know is that it's better than the more-flawed meatbag drivers and improving every day.

So your source that you posted sources is "trust me bro". Just like the post below, here is a great example of what you think sourced content is. Hint, it's not you.

 

[Donald Stanfield]

On average, statistics says no.

Don't expect him to source his claim. I've been trying to get him to provide a source for that for weeks now.

 

[JM.]

So your source that you posted sources is "trust me bro"

Says the guy who keeps accusing me of saying things I haven't and won't source them. Keep flailing, my friend.

Sponsored