Donald Stanfield
Well-Known Member
[
Since Rivian does not break out indirect and direct costs for R1 vehicles for their 10Q/K, perhaps you know some inside information to substantiate the cost structure.
It’s public knowledge that Rivian is gross margin positive on their R1’s. Rivian has announced this several times
I can only go by what is reported and to say " The way you're using the loss per vehicle metric is incorrect." implies you are an accounting expert, regardless of you thinking that the remark is flippant or not.
When you’re wrong, you’re wrong regardless of my qualifications and I suggest keeping your replies to the topic at hand in the future.
So in regards to the tariff, if the battery cells are hit with 25% import duty - single most expensive components, as a whole, on the vehicle - then Rivian has to react. How they blend the cost increase is up to them, as I've mention as an example of bundling with more profitable options and make them the base inclusion, as they raise the price points.
Since I do not write or speak in absolute terms, all I would say is that based on FAS, and GAAP Rivian still is a non-profitable business without environmental credit, as of last quarter. This is a fact.
We all know this too thanks to Rivian’s financial statements. In fact, this is to be expected until R2. I don’t see what the point of mentioning this in a talk about tariffs and their impact on Rivian
Perhaps 1Q2025 will be better, although based on their commentary, there were a good amount of RCV pull forward by Amazon in 4Q2024 so they expect the deliveries to decline, which will hurt their top line.
Again, irrelevant because Rivian losing money is to be expected until R2 and Rivian has the cash to get their considering their declining cash burn rate. Getting net positive with their vehicle sales was a big first step. If other manufacturers are hit with the tariffs and Rivian isn’t hit as badly it could help Rivian’s bottom line.
Sponsored