Search results

Have tesla had a record of mowing down people? No. That's just ignorant talk 1 person was mowed down over 4 billion miles and that was an obvious mistake where the driver was not paying attention We already have a payoff in terms of lives saved whereas waymo has not driven even the number of...

Human deaths are caused mostly by mistakes. Cars drive with 100% effort and do not make human mistakes. So FSD prevents some amount of death but they are not quantifiable as to what type since these deaths happen for mistakes or random reasons. The problem with other ADAS systems (non-tesla)...

Airbag deployment or what tesla classifies as an accident is around 12mph. Not that fast Waymo doesn't drive on interstates but waymos driving is good already. The perception is very good Tesla drives on interstates and it's possible it will hit something but at low speed it would be more...

How so? Because those 38 other people who statistically didn't die? Especially since you believe tesla is the most dangerous brand. More than 38 people should have died Mobileye had a presentation where they said their long range radar could detect a baby lying on the interstate from 300m...

Considering how many deaths there are for every billion miles, I would say that it is. I don't know why people refuse to accept that 2 deaths over 4 billion miles with FSD is statistically very good Look how many accidents you can see being avoided with FSD. Lots. And when you see FSD...

In the case of waymo this is already proven. Even tesla self-driving death rate has proven that. Cars may do stupid things, but "trying to kill you" is a serious accusation without basis. There was a guy who had FSD dodge a shadow on the road. Into the lane of oncoming traffic. He tested 10...

Self driving saves lives. As long as you are not pushing the limits of what your system can do, it doesn't commit human errors. 90% of accidents are human error it also is a convenience feature and good for EVs as it allows them to get more usage out of their battery before it dies due to...

They are not serious. Even Phil Koopman thinks that and he is somewhat critical of tesla. These are normal events for a robotaxi launch, especially one under a microscope.

Not really. Because many of these are non-issues A human being the driver would speed worse than tesla does. They are just not under a microscope one of those is an emergency braking event. Separate from FSD and unavoidable Tesla robotaxi has driven more than 10,000 miles. If you analyze a...

The only ones of those that would have been prevented was #1 and #11

And that list is misleading. When looking at robotaxi failures you need to decide whether they are safety critical or not. Phil Koopman seems to think most of these are overblown given tesla is under a microscope. #1 Not safety critical because car only did it because the lane was clear. #2...

The sensors in a tesla are the same in most cars. They are robust. They are safety critical components. The only "critical thinking" you are doing is trying to back up an article that was refuted after the data released. it is pretty well understood by everyone at this point that the guy in...

Tesla looks to run theirs at half frame rate? Maybe 18fps and they are doing much higher resolution than comma is That's what happens when you haven 100K GPUs Ashok shared back in 2023 and what tesla was sharing at the time is likely old as they keep their breakthroughs a secret

It's very clear that rivian does not have the money for compute or storage to train for high quality ADAS capabilities. Tesla has spent more than 10 billion on this and they are more than doubling their capabilities already. Why would rivian train using 12fps videos when they have 60fps...

you're not understanding it. The signal is not false. FSD clearly disengaged from a torquing of the wheel. The question is whether the torquing of the wheel was a knee, someone having a seizure, someone committing suicide, or simply a mechanical failure of the car like a wheel falling off or...

Because robotaxi is the same according to reports in terms of smoothness and maneuvers Even more-so. Robotaxi is making very bold moves as if they are taking advantage of the fact that model Y is smaller than model S/X one of the limitations of FSD is it drives to account for the largest...

not conjecture. Look at rivian when they released some videos of their training for their ADAS. They are compute limited because they are training on amazon AWS and everything is being stored there. You can see the videos they are training from are low-framerate which would only be a...

FSD is smooth. Driving is a lot smoother than the only real competitor in the robotaxi space. So then people discredit the smooth driving because tesla is not unsuperivsed. People discredit all the good moves that FSD makes because it's a supervised system. Then tesla releases a system which...

Autopilot is from 2017. Tesla drives using AI now and autopilot is not using AI. Also FSD performs "wrong" on legacy model S/X (vertical screen) for some reason. As if the cars are built differently. There was a huge difference in FSD performance when they reduced the latency of FSD in one...

Because you look at anecdotes you see online. You can literally use the system and not be ignorant about the driving abilities. people say it "tried to kill them" when they have zero basis to say these things. FSD is safe. keep in mind rivian is expanding to FSD-like capabilites when they do...