Search results

Well the Launch edition has about 300hp more than a new base model.

No idea, but I think eastern Canada just started receiving vehicles so I guess they wanted to support that market before shutting down the deals.

Or they will be disappointed in the poor selection of old stock as the date approaches, I have ben led to believe the vouchers are only good for old stock. We'll see.

I highly doubt these new models are eligible, why would anyone with voucher choose from old stock? I am under understanding that the voucher is for the old supply & the selection will dwindle as the date approaches. This is the sense I get from the Rivian guides.

I just meant that there was an opportunity to make a little $ here but instead they continue the bleed.

They shouldn't be giving them away, a missed opportunity there. They are in no place to be handing things out.

Where is the 180kwh pack option? Are you going to utilize your voucher or hold out for the real max pack or R2?

The WT3/4? May be cheaper barely but they are pretty spartan & terribly heavy. I wonder how tread life is going to be. Yes demand may be down but they likely overproduced to account for shutdown. What's people is people issue with steering wheel? I would agree with this & limited ed. QM with...

R1T- I believe only the Lightning is cheaper but not really that comparable target audience. The CT is more & the reviews are mixed. The R1S doesn't really have much for comparison either, the comparable vehicles are all ICE. Munro said they are underpriced for product delivered. The entry...

Interesting, thanks for the info. I just recently clocked 310miles on the same configuration & have been wavering on how much I need the extra 7% or 10/11kwh. Image was mostly freeway ave. speed was skewed by long border wait.

That and fill up that dead space with 2 more modules at a fair price & the real MP gain some customers.

Its your car do as you like with it, if I get the R3X the orange mirrors are getting altered.

Most new buyers would think so as it costs more, is quicker, has more hp/tq, more drive modes, longer warranty and only marginally less hwy range(in conserve). The Ascend may change things. Performance Dual-Motor AWD $5,000 0-60 as quick as 3.5 sec | 665 hp Drive modes Quad-Motor...

Since when is getting 25% less hp & having to pay $1000/kw an improvement?

So instead the range extender messes with COG & takes up valuable space in the box.?‍♂️ Now we know what happened to the 500mile truck.

So it is better that it is an abomination of what it once was? I doubt it has the history of the Mustang/Blazer.

When a 7000lb adventure SUV is quicker than a GT Rally "Mustang" yes just OK. Uh, no not me. A Mustang is a sports car not a CUV. It was lost on me when they made it a family car. Same with the Blazer.

Meh. It's too big, range & acceleration are just ok. I have a feeling the Tri-m R3X is going to whoop some .....

Thanks for the thorough report. 6.5hrs of driving time is not bad.

They are trying to streamline, I would guess 3 trims max. The budget conscious Explore & the rumoured Ascend added if they add anything at this point. If anything I see them cutting/simplifying features for instance the power port door seems like a weak point with unnecessary complexity. Really...