Prime
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #1
Maybe a topic most people won't care, but something I noticed affecting my rear seat comfort a bit in the R1T.
On a recent trip to the Venice Hub when I jumped in the back seats of both the R1T and R1S I noticed that the armrest height was pretty different. Couldn't put a finger on it at the time. But, it hit me later that the R1T has its armrest opening starts lower towards the seat cushion to maximize the opening to the gear tunnel, this places the armrest in a less natural position and I think less usable/comfortable for taller riders. The R1S has a pretty standard arm rest height and is comfortable for likely most riders. On the other hand, something you can see in the pictures, the R1T has a longer armrest that incorporates a small storage area, something the R1S is lacking.
I was able to pull off some screenshots from a Raiti's Rides review of the R1T and a Edmunds review of the R1S to demonstrate the comparison.
On a recent trip to the Venice Hub when I jumped in the back seats of both the R1T and R1S I noticed that the armrest height was pretty different. Couldn't put a finger on it at the time. But, it hit me later that the R1T has its armrest opening starts lower towards the seat cushion to maximize the opening to the gear tunnel, this places the armrest in a less natural position and I think less usable/comfortable for taller riders. The R1S has a pretty standard arm rest height and is comfortable for likely most riders. On the other hand, something you can see in the pictures, the R1T has a longer armrest that incorporates a small storage area, something the R1S is lacking.
I was able to pull off some screenshots from a Raiti's Rides review of the R1T and a Edmunds review of the R1S to demonstrate the comparison.
Sponsored
Last edited: