shandering
Well-Known Member
most cars don't have phantom braking because they do not brake for stationary objects. That's very unsafe. Some cars that don't brake for stationary vehicles are so dumb that they brake for cars in the lane next to you.fer because it is an error. It may be accompanied by an increase in justified braking events which would be safer, but actual phantom braking is not indicative of higher safety on its own. I could write a shitty AV algorithm that applies the brakes every 5 to 10 seconds randomly. That would be phantom braking and would not improve safety (other than limiting my top speed I guess).
So your argument would hold more weight if you said "more judicial braking algorithms increase safety, at the cost of increased false positives (phantom braking)", but flat out saying phantom braking is safer is wrong.
cars that do brake for stationary objects have phantom braking
In the case of tesla they have nearly no phantom braking anymore and brake for things as small as little birds crossing the road.
not all phantom braking is caused by shadows. Most of it (in the case of zoox and others) comes from misidentifying what the cars around you are going to do. There's a reason zoox doesn't drive in parking lots.
The issue with you relying on AI is you didn't consider that tesla has accident avoidance (like a driverless car) while others do not
Sponsored
Last edited: