"2027" in Ford language means 2035, but I hope they do everything they sayAlso, Ford announced its next gen EV platform today. More competition coming soon, and they're doing a mid size truck!
https://insideevs.com/news/768601/ford-affordable-electric-truck-universal-ev-platform/

The Georgia factory seems like a distraction given that the R2 launch in Illinois is a make-or-break for the company. And things are only getting more challenging for Rivian with the loss of EV credits and tariffs. Needing the capacity in Georgia would be a good problem to have, if Rivian can survive.Don't overthink it for the quarter-by-quarter stuff.
The stuff that actually matters for 2025:
1. Reiterate (or close to it) production & delivery guidance for the full year. Quarterly ups and downs down matter much as long as the full year is within guidance.
2. Give a not-disastrous view on gross margins for the year. This may be questionable with regulatory credit changes combined with tariff stupidity.
The stuff that matters for 2026:
1. R2 remains on track to launch on-time.
2. R2 product development continues to go well.
3. The Georgia factory remains on-track.
4. The DOE loan isn't going away
Would be nice to see an R3 launch shortly after R2, I know there is huge demand for that one. They released R1 T/S and the EDV nearly at the same time.....why not do it againThe Georgia factory seems like a distraction given that the R2 launch in Illinois is a make-or-break for the company. And things are only getting more challenging for Rivian with the loss of EV credits and tariffs. Need the capacity in Georgia would be a good problem to have, if Rivian can survive.
I've read the Ford announcement about this and it strikes me as over promise and under deliver.Also, Ford announced its next gen EV platform today. More competition coming soon, and they're doing a mid size truck!
https://insideevs.com/news/768601/ford-affordable-electric-truck-universal-ev-platform/
I’ve tried to do the math. I’m pretty confident Rivian can’t get to cash-flow positive without the GA capacity. They can significantly cut cash-burn with just Normal, but not fully close the cash flow gap.The Georgia factory seems like a distraction given that the R2 launch in Illinois is a make-or-break for the company. And things are only getting more challenging for Rivian with the loss of EV credits and tariffs. Need the capacity in Georgia would be a good problem to have, if Rivian can survive.
I too am all for fair market competition, but we do not have a fair market and instead one that has grossly subsidized large vehicles and oil consumption for years. Section 179 allows for tax deduction of ~$31k per "heavy" vehicle, allowing nearly anyone to erase much to all of the cost of a large vehicle. This is entirely there to encourage the purchase of large vehicles, and used for everything from family SUVs and pickups, vans, G-wagons and Hummers. I'd say a >$31,500 deduction is a far greater tax payer subsidy than a $7,500 one per vehicle, and one that has been in place for decades but significantly increased since 2010 and continues to every year.This is false. A true statement would be "the current government doesn't want to take hard working taxpayer money to subsidize car companies like previous ones subsidized Tesla."
The free market should decide. I decided and I didn't need a subsidy to help me decide. I wanted the most awesome truck available in the market so that's what I bought. I don't need someone who has less resources than I do to subsidize my $100k truck. And the current government agrees with me.
There is one silver lining: recent dollar deflation of over 10% and likely to continue for some time will increase imported cars by this same amount, regardless of any added tariffs. While this is overall very bad for US consumers, as dollar deflation decreases our purchasing power, it does make vehicles that are more US made lower cost relative to imported vehicles. However, most Jeeps and Dodges are highly imported, as are many other "American" brands, so both the tariffs and dollar devaluation will also negatively impact many US brands while overall raising costs across the board for all vehicles. This in turn decreases demand, which will in turn reduce costs solely on demand reduction while overall trends will be negative for all. Take that as a silver lining.Heres my prediction:
1. Lack of EV tax credits for buyers will decrease sales/revenue
2. Tariffs on imported parts will increase costs and either increase price and reduce sales or decrease profit per truck
3. Inability to sell carbon credits will hurt profitability
4. Upcoming stagflation courtesy of BBB and Tariffs will keep inflation high, reduce employment, drive higher wages, reduce sales, increase costs, and overall decrease revenue and profitability
In a nutshell...Rivian is F&*$ked and will either cease operations when it hits a cash crunch or will be bought by or merged with another large auto company...or someone like Amazon buying assets in a fire sale through a stock swap.
The only free market is one without tariffs and tax incentives. Not just for vehicles but also for the fuel. Then let the market compete equally.How about no tax credits and no tariffs.
How about free market?
What a Debby Downer you are...Heres my prediction:
1. Lack of EV tax credits for buyers will decrease sales/revenue
2. Tariffs on imported parts will increase costs and either increase price and reduce sales or decrease profit per truck
3. Inability to sell carbon credits will hurt profitability
4. Upcoming stagflation courtesy of BBB and Tariffs will keep inflation high, reduce employment, drive higher wages, reduce sales, increase costs, and overall decrease revenue and profitability
In a nutshell...Rivian is F&*$ked and will either cease operations when it hits a cash crunch or will be bought by or merged with another large auto company...or someone like Amazon buying assets in a fire sale through a stock swap.
One does not have to believe in climate change causes to understand negative impacts of fossil fuel consumption. Simply route all tailpipes into the vehicle and let the driver and passengers decide if they think the breathing of these emissions is good for them. then let the market decide their choice of fuel.Just pointing out I don't agree the evidence is as overwhelming as you do. You can call me uneducated, but I don't believe all the evidence. I have seen alternative data that suggests the evidence so many believe a fact is not really fact. Again, I am not ignoring it, I am just not convinced like you are. There are many who are in my camp. We don't believe the world is ending in 10 years, like we have been told over the past 20+ years. They can only lie so many times before I stop believing them.
Re #4 I would really like to see what you are seeing. I can’t tell you how many small companies that I buy from have already sent emails about price increases. And small companies drive the economy, as does consumer spending. Prices are going up and will continue to go up in a step function to compensate for the tariffs. That will drive inflation. Separately from AI, companies will decrease hiring and do layoffs due to those rising prices and related reductions in sales. It’s pretty simple economics. There WILL be stagflation, and it will probably show up in another 1-2 quarters. Tho you won’t know it cause Trump is about to lie about employment and inflation data. But people will feel it when they lose jobs and keep seeing prices go up!What a Debby Downer you are.... .jk
1. It will reduce sales initially forcing Rivian and other EV makers to work harder to bring better products at lower costs to the market. Many more people understands that EVs are superior commuter vehicles than the number of current EV owner population so it will be a transition period for couple of years.
2. Since Rivian still does not make a profit per vehicle, logical conclusion. That said, if they don't figure it out your prediction of Rivian being acquired is likely.
3. Rivian has never been profitable without the carbon credit so RJ and the management team have a steep hill to climb. I think RJ will have to choose between Rivian surviving as an independent company or him moving up as a Chairman and hand the CEO to an experience and proven executive.
4. There will NOT be sustained inflation or stagflation from what I see. There will be white collar job losses due to AI efficiencies and increase in blue collar work for construction and many hands-on kinds of employment. There are so many factors such as energy prices, foreign exchange rates and corporate profit margins that touches every product sold so just because there is tariff does not equate to all the cost being passed onto the consumer. Media is painting a very simplistic picture.
Let's hope that Rivian can get to R2 and be able to deliver quality product at the competitive price points.