OldGoat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2021
- Threads
- 13
- Messages
- 213
- Reaction score
- 428
- Location
- North Carolina
- Vehicles
- R1T Grand Cherokee 4xe
As a Max Packer, I have to agree this is pretty much a no-brainer.I don't think this is the reason. Purely a guess, but it's an educated guess from my engineering experience in factory startups, which frequently includes us in production planning meetings with senior management, production planners and supply chain staff.
I think some (much or all?) of it comes down to MAXIMIZING the NUMBER of vehicles they can produce. That keeps people employed, the production line running, etc. etc. As a production planner, if I know that I have a finite supply of battery cells each month, and the max pack requires approx 20% more cells, I can either build 10,000 large pack vehicles, or I can build 8,000 max pack vehicles. The answer is obvious. I think those here with production planning experience have been through meetings like this themselves.
Looking at it from this viewpoint, it's the proper decision for almost everyone - employees, production quotas, Wall Street, investor satisfaction, cash flow and 80% of the customers. The ONLY ones it's not good for are the 20% max pack customers. Tough decision, yes, but the right decision for the company and the majority of it's customers.
Unfortunately for us, the cells are completely fungible assets across all vehicles. Therefore, as you note, it really is an either/or component as opposed to a this/that component which is unique to one model vs another.
Sponsored