dleepnw
Well-Known Member
huh? you work in marketing or something?I don't take it as a reduction, I see this as a potential extension based on the lack of availability of some of the services...
Sponsored
huh? you work in marketing or something?I don't take it as a reduction, I see this as a potential extension based on the lack of availability of some of the services...
No, but look at it from a practical perspective. What good would it do to give free charging at all of your chargers for a year to your VERY FIRST customers if there are only 3* chargers in the world?!? My gut feeling tells me that they will bring the one-year timer back after they have more of their services online.huh? you work in marketing or something?
I take it the same way.No, but look at it from a practical perspective. What good would it do to give free charging at all of your chargers for a year to your VERY FIRST customers if there are only 3* chargers in the world?!? My gut feeling tells me that they will bring the one-year timer back after they have more of their services online.
*Maybe more than 3, but you get the point.
who's complaining about getting OTA updates?I would prefer to buy a car like for most of the last 100 years that does not get UI or performance updates from the company...
Instead I'll buy a Rivian and complain because I like the old broken model...and don't like to pay for future improvements. Too bad young people can't afford Rivians, we'd hear a lot less old person/new tech complaining...lol
who's complaining about getting OTA updates?
?
Give me a vehicle with a certain feature set and capabilities. I can determine if the price paid is worth it to me. This BS about getting something in an OTA update means nothing to me. Especially when Rivian is saying it! Why should I pay for something now with talk about OTA updates improving things?
There are no promises, or timelines, for these updates. There is no guarantee that the user experience gets any better. Hell, they could take away features via OTA updates too (think subscription model). Imagine if Apple or Microsoft had a vehicle. Nobody would expect to have a functional vehicle after “patch Tuesday”.
Yes, it would be nice to fix minor things with OTA updates, but that should only be fixes and not feature updates. if we want to opt out of OTA updates, we should be able to.
This is probably the same thinking that keeps these old traditional manufactures in business. Make incremental changes to the same tired old models over 10 years and people keep buying them because they added a 8 inch LCD screen vs a 7 inch one. When I got my Tesla, (coming from a 2016 Cadillac CTS), it was like looking at technology from the future (15 years in traditional manufactures timeframe). And that was just the tip of the ice-berg. Every month or so since then, I get a FREE OTA that adds really cool functionality. Not once have they taken anything away and my car has had an astounding amount of upgrades since I bought it. By Comparison, I rented a fully loaded 2021 Cadillac Escalade a few months back, which was newer than my 2019 Tesla, and the technology in it was so old and outdated, it was laughable. And people pay $90,000 for those cars. I guess it’s not until you realize there is a better way to do it that you realize the old static cars are dinosaurs.Buy an AMC, Nokia, or typewriter…
I generally agree with godfodder0901 on this. This wording (Rivian's wording) gives them more wiggle room to extend membership beyond 1 year for those getting their R1 vehicles before many of the benefits of membership are meaningful. I think the wording will probably change back once things like the RAN are in place. Of course, if you want to be pessimistic, it's true that the wording also allows them to reduce membership to less than a year but I don't think that makes sense for them to do right now.I don't take it as a reduction, I see this as a potential extension based on the lack of availability of some of the services...
If you have to ask...Yea, price was the first thing I looked for
I've never bought anything without knowing the price.If you have to ask...
Their IPO documents listed the membership as a an anticipated $5,500 "lifetime" revenue stream with lifetime estimated as 10 years of ownership. So $5,500/10/12 = $45 per month. (If the free first year is included in their estimate then it's $50/month).I just want to know the pricing after the "extended" trial period ends