skyguyscott
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Scott
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2025
- Threads
- 11
- Messages
- 339
- Reaction score
- 556
- Location
- whereverIroam
- Vehicles
- 2026 R1T
According to the Tesla Deaths website, of the 772 fatalities involving Teslas since 2013, 65 were associated with autopilot, but only 2 involving FSD.I'd happily pay a subscription to make my Gen1 more capable knowing that an old 2020 cheap Tesla with FSD is far better. I recently drove a 2024 M3 with FSD and it blew my mind with door to door navigation. I haven't driven a Gen2 to compare but I'm assuming it is nowhere near what FSD can do and will always lag behind.
Tesla's FSD relies solely on cameras, and you can see videos online where Tesla plowed into a semi-trailer that had jack knifed, blocking all lanes with it's flashers on at night, but the FSD did not recognize what it was seeing and took no action. Other systems that include LIDAR, radar and sonar were tested in a similar scenario and all avoided colliding with the barrier, even when the visual system either did not recognize the danger or were disabled. Others have repeatedly demonstrated how LIDAR and other enhanced sensor arrays can positively detect objects and obstacles in heavy rain, at night, and in other conditions visual systems miss or have difficulty detecting. Despite irrefutable evidence showing the benefits of a more robust sensor array, Musk refuses to add sensors to Teslas, insisting they are superfluous and only add unnecessary cost and complexity.
Sponsored
Last edited: