Search results

I have openpilot on one of the cars with the highest torque (toyota corolla) and it is just a lane centering system. There is no perception other than the forward facing camera and not anything that could safely cause the car to make a lane change on its own. A blind spot monitoring signal is...

Nothing to do with tesla. IIHS is not a difficult test compared to euro NCAP which tests advanced AEB scenarios. Euro NCAP gets progressively harder because cars are getting better every year. The point is exactly what you made. Cheap chinese vehicles have good AEB features. you can either have...

Before rivian even adds hands free driving to all roads, they need to add basic safety features. Rivian would score extremely low on the Euro NCAP test because they do not have basic safety features that cars that cost much less have. Rivian would probably be in the 3 star range because they...

Openpilot is a lane centering system that does user initiated auto lane change. It's mostly just a lane centering system. It is not using 360 degree inputs to make any other decisions. There is no reason you would need collaborative steering in a system that is doing more than just lane...

That's a dangerous use of a single camera that would never make it to a consumer build. It is a limit of the steering column commands and not a limit imposed by comma.ai It makes me wonder how rivian intends to offer city streets driving

And all openpilot does is lane centering It is not performing accident avoidance. It is not dodging potholes. It is not making unprotected turns Torque has nothing to do with tires. Rivian steering column seems to have limits on turning the steering wheel more than 90 degrees and has limits on...

Cooperative in FSD would not work. Because FSD plans a maneuver and it knows best. You cant interfere with what the system wants to do. Cooperative is a copout to make up for poor performance and weak steering torque

The cost difference between 400v and 800v is nothing. Tesla uses dual 400v on the cybertruck. If it brought efficiency gaIns to use 800v then tesla would have already done it years ago. It would give them longer ranges with smaller battery packs There are so many bogus threads on this forum...

The reason I'm comparing to model 3 is because model 3 LOSES to lucid in EPA testing. If you look at real world efficiency of lucid it is close to model S That motortrend article you linked only talks about EPA testing. The 5.0 mi/kwh of the lucid air pure is not something that a lucid owner...

Not a chance. Rivian vehicles are efficient because they optimize the vehicles for the EPA test to get the highest score possible. But the real range of rivian vehicles is bad by comparison. New model Y EPA matches the model 3 with the same size battery. That is unlikely that the model Y is...

the cruise control is good but what he is doing there with lane centering is not good It is not really a lane centering system but a lane departure system that happens to drive in the center of the lane If you are driving in remotely difficult lighting conditions (sun reflections on the road)...

Tesla improved their sound systems after the model 3 launched. They are all good now They have in-house sound system designers and the systems are excellent

That's exactly how windshield sensors work too. Extrapolating whether a windshield is wet as to whether to run auto wipers is not ideal. Especially if the windshield can get dirty from other things like dirt. HW4 auto wipers do perform better. I drove a model Y refresh and I got some dry wipes...

The cameras in a tesla generally do not get dirty. So glare/dirt/snow is not so much the issue you think it is. And for snow the camera is heated. The front facing camera also sees close to 180 degrees, the car creeps forward further than a human would and the car is also angled which affects...

The data is the only thing we have. I do not think it is reliable in the sense of the miles to critical disengagment being 100% accurate, but the causes of disengagement (lane issue, mapping, school zone, pot hole etc.) are well represented as to the main causes of disengagments. That's why...

But it would be lower than the true disengagment data as you never know something is critical until you look back on it with video evidence. At least this is not some people claiming that driver+ drove for hundreds of miles. This website actually monitors disengagements of FSD while you are...

That list is bogus. The iseecars study basically took used cars' mileage as a way to estimate the milage of tesla vehicles. That is definitely a bad thing as the model 3/Y were in high demand and used cars were sold for very little loss at low miles. The problem is that they estimated a brand...

yes. And Model 3/Y HW4 performs much better. For some reason Cybertruck and older Model S/X with the vertical screen have subpar FSD performance

you're making assumptions that the sensor suite is the problem for your interventions. Cybertruck FSD has been worse than other versions of FSD. This has always been the case.

HW4 on cybertruck is not the same as model Y. FSD performs better. Besides we are talking about highway driving where FSD has not had critical interventions since the early days. They still happen but mostly can be avoided by avoiding express lanes