Tesla slapped a bunch of standard equipment(fsd, wheels, paint) on a Model Y Premium AWD and charged $59,990 for LE. More than a Model Y Performance.
Launch R2 has got to be fully optioned dual-motor. Something tells me Rivian put yellow brakes and badging on the press R2's for a reason...
Interesting to see Rivian's future rival Scout Motors is going all camera based like Tesla.
Xiaomi and Xpeng in China are also moving to strictly camera based systems.
I don't know if BMW has announce an iX3 50 sdrive(RWD), but that would be a road trip monster if it happens. I know the iX3 40 sdrive and xdrive have been announced, price under $55k.
Like you said people say they don't need it, then complain during winter months about range.
The non-Launch(Perf) Dual-motor/Large should end up being the volume seller. I understand the $45k price tag is the headline for the base model, but honestly how many customers want an off-road marketed vehicle in RWD.
RJ has said in recent cnbc interview the Launch is Dual-Motor Performance. (yellow brake calipers on all the press R2's give that away)
I don't think there will be a choice. Likely only going to be able to option interior and exterior color.
Just above Model Y Perf.
$59,990 +dest
I just have a hard time believing Rivian figured margins on EV production better than Tesla. Tesla de-contents the hell out their vehicles, Rivian offers a more premium product. Plus battery is huge driver of EV cost and R2 battery is larger.
I will take a stab at it.
Base (RWD, standard pack): $44,990
Dual-Motor/standard pack: $50,990
Dual-Motor/large pack: $54,990
Launch Edition (dual motor, large pack, Performance Pack): $59,990
Tri: $70,000+
Makes sense, similar to Tesla "standard" models. Could even have some sort of cloth seats and have heated seats only. A stereo with less speakers. I could see features like adaptive suspension also not on $45k model. Upgraded suspension being Performance pack only. Software could be paired...
Interesting response to the $45k question. RJ starts talking about the Launch Spec...he say its Perf Dual-motor with a premium interior.
Why would he say it like that? Is the $45k base model going to have less premium materials/features?
Since RJ comfirmed on earnings call the Lauch spec is Performance Dual-motor. It will be a direct competitor to Model Y Perf.
Model Y Perf is $57,490 before dest. To come in below that, one would have to conclude Rivian somehow figured out higher margins on EV production than Tesla. I have...
True competitor to Rivian oddly enough will be VW backed Scout Motors. Even more off-road chops, body on frame, mechanical locking diffs, sway bar disconnects, for sub $60k. But I read the EV models have been delayed, EREVs are first.
Thought about that as well, but above the 39 kwh it said 29min session. If so, 30% to 83% in 29min is not good. It sounds like they are far off from a finished product.
Just going to chalk this up as buggy pre-production software. Because 39.1 kwh from 19-83% makes zero sense.
Software issue is likely culprit. Could also explain sub-200kw charging. It is possible Rivian weren't expecting the results he got or else they would not have let him charge it. I wonder if he was first to charge...had sub-par results. So then no one else got the chance, they clearly had...
The drivers display was also shown during charging. Displaying 215 mile range at 76%. That works out to 283 mile range.
Was he driving and/or charging a small pack?
I saw this analysis on X.
768 cells of which I'm assuming are LG 4695 which are 3.6V at 34AmpH
-Based on the disclosed charging performance, we are still at a ~400V architecture.
-We need around 120 cells to hit the ~400v nominal, but given 768 is the total number, I'm using 128 Cells per...
It has been mentioned in a couple tweets. Apparently Kyle from Out of Spec was texted a picture of it. It was a battery information label...87.4 kwh capacity and minimum pack voltage 240v.