Dark-Fx
Well-Known Member
100% every charge and you should still be within the degradation warranty after 175k miles. Too many people overthink it IMO.
Sponsored
Thought we were talking about best practice principles generally rather than recommended practices for all possible individual circumstances.How do either of those (refuel at home / minimize time fueling in public) address the issue of an unexpected event that would require more than 70% range? I own properties which take 70-80% range for a round trip. If I wake up in the morning and unexpectedly need or want to go then I want to be able to.
I have a functioning charging station in my garage and I like to minimize time spent at public charging stations on the road.
I do this by charging to 80% overnight.
With 7,777 batteries in the vehicle, I think it’s only reasonable to set the daily home charge to 77%, using a 7-hour charging window.Does anyone know why Rivian suggests 70% charge for daily use vs. 80% (which is what I have seen other manufactures recommend). Does Rivian have less buffer in their charging capacities? just seems odd to recommend a "normal daily charge" that is 70% of capacity. I have my R1S set at 80% because that is what I have done with my other EVs... but realized today that Rivian suggests only charging to 70%.
You were responding to @Goose from https://www.rivianforums.com/forum/threads/70-soc-charge-for-daily-vs-80.16651/post-359079 who raised the issue of an unexpected event as rationale for needing 80%. Your response ignored his concern and I was pointing out that some people’s reality may override best practices. If someone has an elderly parent, kid at school, remote job site etc. that they may need to get to on short notice then they should charge to suit their life. Not yours.Thought we were talking about best practice principles generally rather than recommended practices for all possible individual circumstances.
Obviously if one might need to cover near or more than 70% of range regularly and does not want to charge someplace other than home, they should pick a charge level that fits their needs.
In our case, round trip commute is 14 miles so 70% is more than enough and we would like to optimize battery life as much as possible with essentially zero downside in our use scenario.
I can't remember any personal emergency ever that would require a drive that would eat up more than 70% of Rivian range but if one were to come up, we would either charge on the way or if a real emergency drive something else......
This is exactly it. Does my wife need 80% range every day? No. Certainly not. But, what if she forgets to plug in at night (happens often). What if something unexpected pops up and she is needing to drive much further than often? dumb stuff like... the kids need something for a school project that is due tomorrow (and they procrastinated) and the only store with the thing they need in stock is a long way from home. The EV transition can't be "opps, I would have had the range, but I didn't charge enough last night). With our etron S (~150miles @ 80%SOC) my wife never ran it down to 0 miles around town... but she did come close.How do either of those (refuel at home / minimize time fueling in public) address the issue of an unexpected event that would require more than 70% range? I own properties which take 70-80% range for a round trip. If I wake up in the morning and unexpectedly need or want to go then I want to be able to.
I have a functioning charging station in my garage and I like to minimize time spent at public charging stations on the road.
I do this by charging to 80% overnight.
I sure was.You were responding to @Goose.....
Okay, so in my opinion you’re addressing the gas part and I’m addressing the EV (most relevant) part of @Goose ’s post, “You don’t ever have unexpected events happen?”I sure was.
Specifically this part: "Why fill up a fuel tank if you’re not going to need the full range?"
The answer to that seems self-evident and not particularly controversial: people hate gas stations and want to minimize their valuable time spent there.
The difference between filling up a tank with gas (which does no harm to an engine unless we are going to argue that the increased fuel weight increases engine wear) and charging a battery above a level which is needed (which from my understanding does have actual real-world negative consequences) again seems as obvious as the fact that any individual that is worried that 70% isn't enough should charge to more than 70%.
I am not going to potentially degrade my battery life, no matter by how little, to account for what would at best be at most a once in a decade unexpected rationale for needing more; especially when I still an ICE option.
I should have just left it as this I guess:
Already discussed:
https://www.rivianforums.com/forum/...timize-battery-life-whats-your-strategy.9174/
etc, etc......
I wasn't trying to start an argument or be a jerk in anyway. It's hard to convey tone over text.I sure was.
Specifically this part: "Why fill up a fuel tank if you’re not going to need the full range?"
The answer to that seems self-evident and not particularly controversial: people hate gas stations and want to minimize their valuable time spent there.
The difference between filling up a tank with gas (which does no harm to an engine unless we are going to argue that the increased fuel weight increases engine wear) and charging a battery above a level which is needed (which from my understanding does have actual real-world negative consequences) again seems as obvious as the fact that any individual that is worried that 70% isn't enough should charge to more than 70%.
I am not going to potentially degrade my battery life, no matter by how little, to account for what would at best be at most a once in a decade unexpected rationale for needing more; especially when I still an ICE option.
I should have just left it as this I guess:
Already discussed:
https://www.rivianforums.com/forum/...timize-battery-life-whats-your-strategy.9174/
etc, etc......
I know it’s not the norm. I just commented on this thread to make a point that I personally wouldn’t feel comfortable charging to 70% with my daily commute. I will continue to charge daily to 80% whether recommended or not. That’s what works for me. There is no right or wrong way. It’s based off your own situation.I think this conversation is hilarious. Obviously no one is telling others to put themselves at risk of being stranded. 137 miles commuting is well outside the norm, so your charging behavior will likely be outside the norm too.
Maybe I'm just lucky but I live in a moderately rural area and even my longest "oops" errand is 20 miles away. We've made do with my wife's C40 that we charge to 80% once every few days when it drops below 30%. Even at 30% I can make it to Costco and back in the dead of winter. My R1S will probably stay at 70% because I should realistically have a few hours warning of needing to drive over 100 miles in a sitting.
Adjust your own life accordingly, no one is saying strand yourself. And if you somehow find yourself doing 100 miles in errands than charge that sucker to 100%
I don't view cars as disposable items. I'm in my mid 50s and still have every car I've ever purchased besides one which I gave to a family member in need and which was frankly a piece of shit even when new.......Also how many plan to keep their cars past 8 years? With my driving I’ll be at 175k miles in 5.83 years. I typically don’t keep my cars for more than a couple years anyways, so I’m not worried.
Bingo! This is why I fluctuate between 75-80%.You don’t ever have unexpected events happen? Why fill up a fuel tank if you’re not going to need the full range?