Sponsored

First short road trip in R2 - Initial range and efficiency

ksurfier

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ken
Joined
Aug 23, 2022
Threads
54
Messages
1,193
Reaction score
1,137
Location
CA
Vehicles
R1S, Tesla
Occupation
Fake Science Lead
Clubs
 
Points to 2.6 MPK for the R2 w/ 20” wheels at 70 mph:

Rivian R1T R1S First short road trip in R2 - Initial range and efficiency hui3ap6z83ah1





  • The most useful direct observation is the R2’s 2.5–2.6 mi/kWh interstate efficiency at approximately 78 mph on 20-inch all-terrain tires. The overall 2.8 mi/kWh result included substantial lower-speed driving and should not be treated as the vehicle’s highway efficiency.

  • The interstate segment had a 5–10 mph tail/crosswind, meaning the R2’s effective aerodynamic airspeed was closer to roughly 68–73 mph for at least part of the drive. Accordingly, the observed 2.5–2.6 mi/kWh is a reasonable real-world proxy for approximately 70 mph in still air.

  • The trip included a net elevation gain of approximately 500 feet over 131 miles and rolling hills. This created a modest efficiency penalty, although it was too small to fully explain or materially invalidate the highway result.

  • The vehicle was equipped with brand-new 20-inch A/T tires with only 45 miles on them. Several commenters noted that new tires can improve somewhat after a few hundred to approximately 1,000 miles of break-in, so the test may modestly understate mature-tire efficiency.

  • The R2 was operated in All-Purpose mode, not a dedicated efficiency or Conserve mode. This supports treating 2.6 mi/kWh as a normal-use estimate rather than a best-case maximum.

  • Multiple commenters correctly identified 78 mph as the dominant reason for the relatively low highway efficiency. Because aerodynamic energy consumption rises rapidly with speed, a reduction from 78 mph to 70 mph should produce a meaningful efficiency improvement, but the tailwind already provided much of that aerodynamic benefit during this particular trip.

  • A commenter suggested the R2 might exceed 3.0 mi/kWh at 70 mph, based partly on a reported 60–80-mile difference between 70 and 80 mph in an R1S. That is directionally useful, but it is not a direct R2 measurement and likely represents an optimistic upper bound rather than the best central estimate.

  • The displayed Rivian efficiency value may itself have some uncertainty. One R1 owner reported that the displayed mi/kWh sometimes differed materially from energy-use calculations, so a controlled test using measured battery energy would be preferable.

  • Taken together, the available evidence supports a 70 mph, 70°F efficiency estimate of approximately 2.55–2.65 mi/kWh for the R2 on 20-inch A/T tires, with 2.60 mi/kWh as the best working value.

  • Assuming the 21-inch road-oriented setup is 5% more efficient, its corresponding estimate is:
    • 20-inch A/T: 2.60 mi/kWh
    • 21-inch: 2.73 mi/kWh

  • A reasonable uncertainty range is approximately:
    • 20-inch A/T: 2.55–2.65 mi/kWh
    • 21-inch: 2.68–2.78 mi/kWh

  • The clearest current conclusion is therefore: At 70 mph and 70°F, expect approximately 2.6 mi/kWh on 20-inch A/T tires and approximately 2.7–2.75 mi/kWh on 21-inch wheels.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

Jeremy3292

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jeremy
Joined
Apr 27, 2026
Threads
6
Messages
855
Reaction score
1,403
Location
South Carolina
Vehicles
R2
You don't need to keep posting new threads about this and another thread an hour ago with a poll on this. We've been over this a thousand times in a 11+ page thread already. You just don't like the answer and don't actually want discourse on the topic. Linked below for everyone who wants to read 11+ pages on this exact thing, in fact where OP already posted this exact Reddit link already.

@Indy avocado and @Budman have respected data on this also I believe that points to 3 MPK at 70 mph also.

TLDR: OP insists R2 efficiency is bad, we can all argue about it for 11 more pages again if we want to.

https://www.rivianforums.com/forum/...st-80-mph-vs-70-mph-changed-everything.61484/

Here's the most official 70 mph test we have to date from Tom at State of Charge also getting 3 MPK.

 
Last edited:
OP
OP
ksurfier

ksurfier

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ken
Joined
Aug 23, 2022
Threads
54
Messages
1,193
Reaction score
1,137
Location
CA
Vehicles
R1S, Tesla
Occupation
Fake Science Lead
Clubs
 
You don't need to keep posting new threads about this and another thread an hour ago with a poll on this. We've been over this a thousand times in a 11+ page thread already. You just don't like the answer and don't actually want discourse on the topic. Linked below for everyone who wants to read 11+ pages on this exact thing, in fact where OP already posted this exact Reddit link already.

@Indy avocado and @Budman have respected data on this also I believe that points to 3 MPK at 70 mph also.

TLDR: OP insists R2 efficiency is bad, we can all argue about it for 11 more pages again if we want to.

https://www.rivianforums.com/forum/...st-80-mph-vs-70-mph-changed-everything.61484/

Here's the most official 70 mph test we have to date from Tom at State of Charge also getting 3 MPK.

You also don’t need to keep reposting the same Colorado test as though it definitively represents the R2’s real-world efficiency. That test was conducted at high elevation under conditions that materially affect aerodynamic drag and energy consumption, yet you’ve now cited or referenced it more than ten times without acknowledging those limitations. The first-hand owner data linked here directly contradicts the conclusion you keep drawing from that single test and provides a more relevant real-world benchmark.
Sponsored

 
 








Top