evguy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2022
- Threads
- 6
- Messages
- 340
- Reaction score
- 555
- Location
- Orange County, CA
- Vehicles
- '22 R1S LE; '18 Model 3 LR
- Occupation
- Law
There's another (and I think better) explanation for why Rivian is not raising capital right now: They're in a position to execute this year's cost reductions plans, and achieve gross profit, while still having billions on hand at the end of that effort. The reason they're in that position is that they already raised $2.8B last year, before the demand softening freakout (mild stroke of genius in hindsight), bringing total cash and equivalents to $9B. Rivian thinks they'll be in a better position to raise more capital on better terms in 2025, after they have executed several more steps on their path to profitability.What I said was that it makes no sense that RIVN has not raised capital, and that the only reasonable explanation for why they haven't raised capital, coincident with delaying the Georgia plant (which is the only path to profitability), is that it is now negotiating a takeover. Does anyone disagree? If they were planning to raise capital (which they need to do if it is not doing a takeover), would you have prefered they raise more capital at $50 per share or $8 per share, where it trades at today?
Regarding a takeover, I said that an optimal takeover for a buyer would be a prepack bankruptcy. Would anyone disagree? That's almost always the best way to takeover in this kind of situation.
Sponsored