UnsungZero_OldTimeAdMan
Well-Known Member
And GM is now gold standard for engineering or doing right? /sYou know, it's interesting that GM was able to put 18" wheels on the Hummer EV then. GVCW is a little lower, but not by much.
Sponsored
And GM is now gold standard for engineering or doing right? /sYou know, it's interesting that GM was able to put 18" wheels on the Hummer EV then. GVCW is a little lower, but not by much.
You are ok with reduced braking performance?How about a front brake 'downsize' kit so 18" wheels can fit?
"In the braking distance test, the R1S was considerably better in the 60 to 0 mph braking test, beating its rival by 10 meters"You know, it's interesting that GM was able to put 18" wheels on the Hummer EV then. GVCW is a little lower, but not by much.
A lot of braking effort is a function of tires as well. The Hummer EV shipped with MT tires vs the Rivian's AT tires. Stopping distance on my R1T is dramatically worse with the K02 tires versus the 22" sport tires it came with. I have been giving more space.You are ok with reduced braking performance?
"In the braking distance test, the R1S was considerably better in the 60 to 0 mph braking test, beating its rival by 10 meters"
I like the Hummer but its braking is not stellar, looks like it could use 20" wheels & larger brakes.
The thing that...non-Engineers and super car enthusiasts don't realize about brakes is, you think of them as "friction" components.I'm not looking to have a huge debate about possibly a marginal difference in brake performance on a vehicle where you hardly use the brakes; I was giving a suggestion for a product targeted for people looking to improve their vehicle for trail use, not track use. 1 ton trucks have huge gcwr numbers and somehow can run 18" wheels.
Thanks for sharing… it shows that was a False claim, but it was still an interesting read about history that I knew nothing about.We could have adopted the metric system for weights and measures, but pirates stole the 1 kg standard and imprisoned the scientist bringing it to the US.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/metric-system-pirates/
I second this. I'm not really sure what a tie rod is, but I feel like I should have a few spare ones to carry around with me to share with friends after reading about the occasional failures.@MountainPassPerformance
What are your plans for performance parts?
a couple that I think make sense and you probably will have 1st mover advantage!!
1. Performance Tie Rods. Although I have not experienced one breaking some in the community have experienced this. It would be nice to have opitons for beefed up Tie Rods to upgrade or to carry when going offorad
2. A coilover kit to replace the stock air suspension. Similar cars with air suspension like the Land Rover Range Rover and Mercedes GLS become very expensive to maintain as they age and usually it's the air systems that go bad first before any other fancy stuff. If I want to keep my R1S after warranty I would love to have options similar to what Arnott offers for Mercedes air suspension.
The tie rod is an adjustable-length link in the steering. Without it, you can't turn the wheel. With incorrect length set, you can't track straight while steering wheel is dead center. It's an intentionally weak link in the system, like an electrical fuse. A tie rod that is too strong, could transfer force to and cause failure in other less accessible and/or more expensive components.I second this. I'm not really sure what a tie rod is, but I feel like I should have a few spare ones to carry around with me to share with friends after reading about the occasional failures.
Oh, and maybe some grab handles on the a-pillar. That's not really performance, but that sure would be nice.
This guy has nailed it....you don't need a beefier TRE, you may very well like to have access to a lower cost (than OEM) TRE for an on-the-trail replacement though...The tie rod is an adjustable-length link in the steering. Without it, you can't turn the wheel. With incorrect length set, you can't track straight while steering wheel is dead center. It's an intentionally weak link in the system, like an electrical fuse. A tie rod that is too strong, could transfer force to and cause failure in other less accessible and/or more expensive components.
![]()
These types of software modifications are the hardest modifications to achieve and are basically impossible without some level of OEM cooperation or "unintended" cooperation ?Asking for a friend, but can the top speed of ~110 mph (I can't remember the exact number) beremoved? There was some outcry a while ago for a 1/4 mile mode or a track mode that removes it for a certain amount of time or something... again, asking for a friend; I drive sedately around my suburban neighborhood and local malls.
I am NOT a mechanical engineer (or better yet not a Mechanic) but couldn't you design the long straight "rod" that is the "weak point" to be detachable at BOTH ends so the week link is easily field servicable? I understand for alignment you probably only want adjustment on one end of it, but could instead of the interior side being a bigger piece with more parts, just "unpin/unscrew" long straight "rod" replace and be on your way. For an offroad vehicle the weak link should be cheap and easy to replace in the mud. Not a $500 part that is less than simple (not saying exactly difficult, just involved)The tie rod is an adjustable-length link in the steering. Without it, you can't turn the wheel. With incorrect length set, you can't track straight while steering wheel is dead center. It's an intentionally weak link in the system, like an electrical fuse. A tie rod that is too strong, could transfer force to and cause failure in other less accessible and/or more expensive components.
![]()