Tesla nefarious behavior?

[COdogman]

Sponsored

 

[COdogman]

I mentioned this in another thread, it may have saved me from an idiot running a red light.

 

[JM.]

I told you so...

Also these are the same people that went suddenly quiet when the original fake video was exposed for what it was, after arguing for days. Hilarious stuff. Musk Derangement Syndrome is a helluva drug.

 

[COdogman]

I told you so...

Also these are the same people that went suddenly quiet when the original fake video was exposed for what it was, after arguing for days. Hilarious stuff. Musk Derangement Syndrome is a helluva drug.

 

[JM.]

 

[COdogman]

 

[pamalabama]

you do know waymo avoids trains too? It would be very trivial to have the car never route over a train track when robotaxi becomes a thing

 

[COdogman]

you do know waymo avoids trains too? It would be very trivial to have the car never route over a train track when robotaxi becomes a thing

Yes, that was a very smooth “avoidance” of a train

Let me predict your excuse: It was probably HW3… as if Tesla issued a communication informing owners of vehicles equipped with HW3 it isn’t safe to use FSD/ Autopilot anymore on public roads

 

[KRG]

Unless you claim that Tesla is in the highest death rates solely because it attracts shitty

I’ll claim that. Shitty drivers LOVE Teslas. Shitty drivers + lots of power spells disaster.

 

[Donald Stanfield]

I told you so...

Also these are the same people that went suddenly quiet when the original fake video was exposed for what it was, after arguing for days. Hilarious stuff. Musk Derangement Syndrome is a helluva drug.

We are tired of arguing with people who think seatbelts drive their cars. With that foundational lack of understanding I have better luck explaining stuff to my dog.

 

[pamalabama]

Yes, that was a very smooth “avoidance” of a train

Let me predict your excuse: It was probably HW3… as if Tesla issued a communication informing owners of vehicles equipped with HW3 it isn’t safe to use FSD/ Autopilot anymore on public roads

Nope. In fact if you were even paying attention that version is very old. Which means the HW3 and HW4 version of FSD would have been the same


It's only recently in the past 6 months that FSD has a significant uptick in safety and quality because they switched to HW4 exclusive versions

HW4 is brand new cameras and requires retraining the model for the new cameras and sensors which took a lot of time.

HW5 is just a brand new AI5 computer which will increase the compute 8x or whatever. This is a big deal because we can assume that FSD has a lot more capability but the models that are running in the car are a lot smaller than what is needed.

 

[JM.]

We are tired of arguing with people who think seatbelts drive their cars.

Once again I bet you can't quote the thread where that happened. However it's pretty easy to point out where hypocrites applied different standards to different vehicle safety features based on prejudice or derangement.

 

[Donald Stanfield]

Once again I bet you can't quote the thread where that happened. However it's pretty easy to point out where hypocrites applied different standards to different vehicle safety features based on prejudice or derangement.

It was when you equated the liability of self-driving car manufacturers and seatbelt manufacturers, or will you deny making that comparison?

 

[JM.]

or will you deny making that comparison?

No, of course not, comparing one safety feature to another safety feature is logical and valid. It's what you should do also, rather than create moving goal posts for them based on prejudice.

 

[Donald Stanfield]

No, of course not, comparing one safety feature to another safety feature is logical and valid. It's what you should do also, rather than create moving goal posts for them based on prejudice.

LOL, that's a massive false equivalence, and the fact that you don't understand why underscores the whole issue with you.

Sponsored