kanundrum
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 2, 2020
- Threads
- 273
- Messages
- 4,693
- Reaction score
- 13,671
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Vehicles
- Giulia QV, R1S (Sept 22 Delivery)
- Occupation
- IT
- Thread starter
- #1
Sponsored
Gonna check this out - thanks to the OP for sharing. The analysis I have seen is that for the first 18 mos (for a normal driver, i.e. 18,000 miles), EVs are more polluting due to mfg processes, materials; however, after that point, electric is so much more cleaner that EV's become better for the environment unless you live in a state with really dirty electric (read West Virginia)That guys channel is pretty awesome. I have watched a ton of his videos, always well put together.
For me personally, my current car is probably better. I just don't drive enough to hit the brake even point for quite some time.
There is so much bad stuff out there. I've caught this guy in minor mistakes but they are always minor. He is orders of magnitude better than most of the garbage one sees and a breath of fresh air for sure.That guys channel is pretty awesome. I have watched a ton of his videos, always well put together.
Remember that 60% fossil is the average and other places are cleaner. Quebec is nearly 0 and New York buys lots and lots of electricity from Quebec. Then many of us charge at least partially from solar, wind, etc.... electric is so much more cleaner that EV's become better for the environment unless you live in a state with really dirty electric (read West Virginia)
Yes I’ve heard this before but glad he had some data to make it more believable. It’s all steps in the right direction that’s what is the point, I’m so glad to be a part of this. Love what this company stands for, i had deposits down for CT, Ford, and Hummer, I got refunded on all. Might look to Volvo c40 for the wife, that looks amazing.
I haven't watched the video, but based on the title it would seem that the premise relies on the assumption that your old vehicle goes to the scrap yard if you buy a new electric vehicle.Is Keeping your Old Car Better for the Environment?
Yes it isn’t perfect, and in order to make a short video there are often sweeping generalizations, but they are directionally correct and consistently well informed.There is so much bad stuff out there. I've caught this guy in minor mistakes but they are always minor. He is orders of magnitude better than most of the garbage one sees and a breath of fresh air for sure.
I have an environmental chemist friend who studies air quality and global warming. We had the exact same discussion. My wife and I drive maybe 6k miles a year total. I was making the argument that I probably shouldn’t contribute to the needless production of extra vehicles despite my desire to go electric. Her response was exactly yours: right now we need strong signals to the market that the demand is for EVs and that is what should be built.Another thing to consider beyond your own personal impact is that if everyone waited until their cars died then there'd be even fewer early adopters, and without a lot of early adopters the EV vehicles would never really take off, or certainly not as quickly.
I wasn't really in the market for a car, and when I thought about new options, I wasn't really thinking much about electric. But after my wife needed a new car and settled on a Tesla, I can't imagine my next one being anything but electric. Just in seeing ours, I have a neighbor who's now more on board with EVs than he was before and thinking of upgrading, a sibling who's thinking about trading in for one, not to mention other people who've had a bunch of the standard questions about range/charging/etc that I could answer and set them at ease towards maybe buying electric in the future.
Yeah, they're not perfect yet and not without compromise, and maybe trading before our current car dies is suboptimal, but as a whole every little bit counts. Maybe it's just talking myself into buying something more expensive than I usually would, but I feel good about being part of helping things move forward.
Perhaps it might be advisable to watch the video rather than offer your opinion based on the title.I haven't watched the video, but based on the title ....
That is an inaccurate premise.
he briefly addresses that. Assuming your vehicles goes to the scrap yard and not someone's junker is a conservative assumption that simplifies the analysis.I haven't watched the video, but based on the title it would seem that the premise relies on the assumption that your old vehicle goes to the scrap yard if you buy a new electric vehicle.
That is an inaccurate premise. If keeping your old vehicle was an option, it shouldn't be going to the scrap yard when you move on to a new vehicle. Someone else will be driving it. The same number of vehicles will go to the scrap yard each year no matter what you choose to do (short of intentionally neglecting/destroying your current vehicle).
The environment doesn't care who's driving the vehicle. To evaluate your impact on the environment, you need to look at your impact on the entire fleet. If you primary concern is what is best for the environment, and you believe that EV is better for environment than ICE, all you need to ask how can you increase the total number of EV's produced. Each EV produced is one less ICE produced.