maddave12
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Dave
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2022
- Threads
- 6
- Messages
- 98
- Reaction score
- 141
- Location
- Pierce County, WA
- Vehicles
- R1T, Volvo XC90, Subaru Outback
- Occupation
- Selfless supporter of the economy
- Thread starter
- #1
I was pondering whether I'd consider the R1T to really be an "adventure" vehicle while driving yesterday. I realize the claim is partly branding, this isn't all that important since I love the thing, and I don't want to get overly pedantic, but still...
"Yes, it is":
- acceleration
- ground clearance
- cornering on fairly firm surfaces
- camp speaker (I know it's not universally loved, but it still falls in this category)
- 4-wheel independent traction control
- short-range towing ability
- water fording depth
"Could have been":
- camp kitchen
"No, not really":
- range limitations (particularly if doing something demanding)
- fragile outer skin
- weight (an issue on packed snow, ice, mud, sand....)
- long wheelbase (R1T particularly)
- time/cost for repairs
- very limited ability to customize (larger wheels/tires, body lift, light bar, winch, etc.)
- poor turning radius
So, then I ask, how is it better than a well-modified Jeep?
- on-road experience (acceleration, ride, cornering, quiet)
- short-range towing
- cargo space
- water fording depth
- ... is that it?
And, where is it good as a "real" truck?
- road experience (acceleration, ride, cornering, quiet)
- short-range towing ability
- cheaper to operate, assuming your electricity is cheap
I can see it's a different blend of compromises than most of what's out there, so marketing it differently makes sense. Still, would you call it an 'adventure vehicle'? If so, why?
Curious about others' thoughts...
"Yes, it is":
- acceleration
- ground clearance
- cornering on fairly firm surfaces
- camp speaker (I know it's not universally loved, but it still falls in this category)
- 4-wheel independent traction control
- short-range towing ability
- water fording depth
"Could have been":
- camp kitchen
"No, not really":
- range limitations (particularly if doing something demanding)
- fragile outer skin
- weight (an issue on packed snow, ice, mud, sand....)
- long wheelbase (R1T particularly)
- time/cost for repairs
- very limited ability to customize (larger wheels/tires, body lift, light bar, winch, etc.)
- poor turning radius
So, then I ask, how is it better than a well-modified Jeep?
- on-road experience (acceleration, ride, cornering, quiet)
- short-range towing
- cargo space
- water fording depth
- ... is that it?
And, where is it good as a "real" truck?
- road experience (acceleration, ride, cornering, quiet)
- short-range towing ability
- cheaper to operate, assuming your electricity is cheap
I can see it's a different blend of compromises than most of what's out there, so marketing it differently makes sense. Still, would you call it an 'adventure vehicle'? If so, why?
Curious about others' thoughts...
Sponsored
Last edited: