LevelHeaded
Well-Known Member
eh, arguable. EV "industry standard" seems to closely couple motor with what would generally be considered trim elsewhereindustry standard is that the motor is not firmly associated to a trim level
Model 3 RWD
Model 3 LRAWD
Model 3 Performance AWD
Each has a different motor configuration or different motor specs. Most would argue these are Tesla's implementation of trims
Companies like Rivian and Tesla are bucking a lot of legacy "industry trends," so not sure the comparison is always useful
Besides, you could just call QM an "option package" within a "trim" then (again, not sure making connections where there aren't strong ones makes much sense, but if we're doing it we're doing it)
Option packages come with features
Vehicles without the option package don't have the features
e.g. F-150 Lariat Mid vs Lariat High
Lastly, to make another random connection with how configurations work on an ICE vehicle that's unrelated to the R1, if 2 Ford Broncos have 2 different sets of drive modes, they're different trims. QM & DM have different drive modes. So...
TL;DR: I don't think you can argue that the contenting / decontenting of vehicles is standardized across the entire industry with respect to the combination of motors & features, trims & features, option packages & features... manufacturers all have different patterns here, and sometimes those patterns even differ from vehicle-to-vehicle within the same manufacturer.
Sponsored
Last edited: