-
Announcing our new "CLUBS" section where you can join or create a Rivian club or group! You can use this new feature to conveniently plan and discuss local events, gatherings or other club/group related topics.
So we encourage you to join (or start) special-interest and regional-based Rivian clubs at: https://www.rivianforums.com/forum/group-categories/clubs-groups.1/
Sponsored
Took Delivery of our R1S Performance Dual Motor Max Pack!
Ronaldinho
Active Member
Congrats on the new ride. And thanks for indulging all of us max pack folks who are clearly starved for information.
Lifted this from another thread, but are you able to confirm this EPA information about the max pack battery test?
Lifted this from another thread, but are you able to confirm this EPA information about the max pack battery test?
vandy1981
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #19
Sure I'll look when I have a chance. What does this label tell you?Congrats on the new ride. And thanks for indulging all of us max pack folks who are clearly starved for information.
Lifted this from another thread, but are you able to confirm this EPA information about the max pack battery test?
Ronaldinho
Active Member
Thanks, should confirm what test group the max pack trucks are part of.
Sponsored
Bernard Arsenault
New Member
Here is the certification summary of the Test group PRIVT00.0192
https://www3.epa.gov/otaq/datafiles/CSI-PRIVT00.0192.PDF. Interesting document.
I note that it mentioned Large pack battery with a battery capacity of 169. So is it 169 KWhr?
https://www3.epa.gov/otaq/datafiles/CSI-PRIVT00.0192.PDF. Interesting document.
I note that it mentioned Large pack battery with a battery capacity of 169. So is it 169 KWhr?
Bernard Arsenault
New Member
In reading I found that: The 169 is not the battery total energy but the battery specific energy or battery energy density given in Wh/l: this is related to the battery chemistry.
Ronaldinho
Active Member
Right, good find. But it looked like that was all large pack data? Unless I missed it, I didn't see any max pack references in there.
vandy1981
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #25
I charged the R1S from empty on our home charger. It took 133 kWh before I had to unplug at 95%. It would be 140 kWh if I extrapolate to 100%.
Assuming 10% loss in efficiency, we'd be at 126 kWh which is pretty much the same as the large pack. The math doesn't quite add up but I'll keep reporting data as I get it.
Assuming 10% loss in efficiency, we'd be at 126 kWh which is pretty much the same as the large pack. The math doesn't quite add up but I'll keep reporting data as I get it.
Sponsored
Supratachophobia
Well-Known Member
I'm confused, did you say it's no bigger than the large pack? 139kwh added prior to accounting for charging losses?I charged the R1S from empty on our home charger. It took 133 kWh before I had to unplug at 95%. It would be 140 kWh if I extrapolate to 100%.
Assuming 10% loss in efficiency, we'd be at 126 kWh which is pretty much the same as the large pack. The math doesn't quite add up but I'll keep reporting data as I get it.
vandy1981
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #29
This is the sticker from my R1SCongrats on the new ride. And thanks for indulging all of us max pack folks who are clearly starved for information.
Lifted this from another thread, but are you able to confirm this EPA information about the max pack battery test?
Ronaldinho
Active Member
Awesome, thanks for confirming what @Dark-Fx found previously.This is the sticker from my R1S
edit: clarity
Sponsored
Last edited:
Similar threads
