Nine_One_Six_R1S
Well-Known Member
I've seen videos on YT where the measured torque is the same in their test rig. Obviously in practice maybe you have experienced something else. But these may have the same internals and just the collet difference to hold 3/8's vs 1/2's socketsI keep the 1/2 in stubby the frunk, but I also have the 1/2 high torque available in case things get really stubborn. However, the stubby with the 2.5ah HO has been more than up to the task thus far.
Edit: I also have the 3/8 mid torque which on paper says it can do lug nuts, but I've been disappointed too often, hence the stubby.
Ohhh, that sounds like a plan then. Since I am in no hurry I can wait for 2x more torque.If you wait until September, you can get the new Gen 2 M12 Stubby, which has more than twice the torque (in reverse anyways) of the current gen.
3/8” makes for more compact sockets and is sufficient for lug nut removal. I also carry a 1/2” torque wrench, since you really should torque lug nuts to spec and not torque with the impact. I have a 1/2” drive 22mm deep well socket and an impact adapter to fit the socket to my 3/8” stubby.
I was going to go with the 1/2” thinking it would be necessary for lug nuts on the road, but our heavy equipment field mechanic said he’d go with the 3/8”—that it’s plenty for general truck wheel swapping needs (or really anything on these vehicles). We have 1/2” mid and high torque M18 impacts in our shop and on his service truck. They are definitely overkill for anything normal on our vehicles (probably unlikely that you have any rusted or seized fasteners on something so new).
Sponsored