srnyoung
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Nate
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2022
- Threads
- 12
- Messages
- 424
- Reaction score
- 487
- Location
- Portland, Oregon
- Vehicles
- '15 eGolf, '04 Suzuki Grand Vitara
- Occupation
- Teacher
Thanks for the [kind] correction. Not sure why I thought it was Disney and I’m surprised I missed the “coda”…I’m saying that material that is clearly public domain should not be allowed to be patented many years later. The copyright and patent system has been broken for years. I’m not against patents or copyrights, just abuse and trolling.
In the case of Happy Birthday, it was public domain. Warner Music copyrighted it, and collected millions. In 2016, it was reversed and they had to pay damages. It was lucrative, but not now, as it never should have been.
“In a coda to one of the most notable music copyright lawsuits in years, the Warner Music Group has agreed to pay $14 million to settle claims over “Happy Birthday to You,” after a judge ruled last year that the company’s long-claimed copyright to the famous song was invalid.
Warner Music, through its publishing subsidiary Warner/Chappell, agreed after mediation to pay the settlement to a class of “thousands of people and entities” who had paid licensing fees to use the song since 1949, according to filings in federal court on Monday.”
Anyway, I thought the idea of capitalism was to collect every last dime for oneself regardless of the damage it does to society!? At least, that’s what I am learning over on the RIVN stock traders thread…
Sponsored