Sponsored

mkhuffman

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Nov 9, 2020
Threads
14
Messages
2,844
Reaction score
3,203
Location
Virginia
Vehicles
2025 R1T Tri-Max, Jeep GC-L, VW Jetta
You could always consider the Autofit Pro one. I was one of the first to get one and, it has been awesome. Maybe not the efficiency gains of the Wakeshield one. I am doing about 1-2% better efficiency that I was with just my tonneau cover alone.
One of the things I like about the WakeShield is how easy it is to open up if you need to haul something taller. It is also relatively light, so it isn't hard to remove when needed. But my main motivation was the claimed efficiency improvements. I could really use an extra 10% on the highway.

Oh, well. I do like the looks of the Autofit.
Sponsored

 

josh0

Well-Known Member
First Name
Josh
Joined
Jan 4, 2024
Threads
26
Messages
362
Reaction score
508
Location
Abiquiu, NM / Baltimore, MD
Vehicles
2023 (Nov) R1T, 2014 Jeep Cherokee
Well, it hardly seems to matter, as the Wakeshield website has been offline for a while, so I'm guessing they're gone for good now, but as I just put a new set of tires on my R1T, I figured I might as well post the efficiency graphs I got before and after installing the Wakeshielf on the original stock tires.

There does seem to have been a noticeable improvement in efficiency at highway speeds. Below 45 mph, it was more efficient without the topper, but above 45 mph it was more efficient with it, right up until about 75 mph, where they met again. As my primary concern is with long road trips, it definitely seems to have been a worthwhile investment. I'm hoping that the increased efficiency it offers will offset the hit I'll take from the new tires (went from the 21" Pirelli Scorpions to 22" Goodyear Wranglers, but don't have enough miles on them to do any analysis yet). There's only about 50 miles recorded in each of the drives below 20 mph, so probably best to ignore that weird spike in Wh/Mile at the lowest speeds.

Rivian R1T R1S R1T topper shell by Wakeshield Screenshot 2026-03-20 at 09.56.50
Rivian R1T R1S R1T topper shell by Wakeshield Screenshot 2026-03-20 at 09.56.45
 

mkhuffman

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Nov 9, 2020
Threads
14
Messages
2,844
Reaction score
3,203
Location
Virginia
Vehicles
2025 R1T Tri-Max, Jeep GC-L, VW Jetta
Well, it hardly seems to matter, as the Wakeshield website has been offline for a while, so I'm guessing they're gone for good now, but as I just put a new set of tires on my R1T, I figured I might as well post the efficiency graphs I got before and after installing the Wakeshielf on the original stock tires.

There does seem to have been a noticeable improvement in efficiency at highway speeds. Below 45 mph, it was more efficient without the topper, but above 45 mph it was more efficient with it, right up until about 75 mph, where they met again. As my primary concern is with long road trips, it definitely seems to have been a worthwhile investment. I'm hoping that the increased efficiency it offers will offset the hit I'll take from the new tires (went from the 21" Pirelli Scorpions to 22" Goodyear Wranglers, but don't have enough miles on them to do any analysis yet). There's only about 50 miles recorded in each of the drives below 20 mph, so probably best to ignore that weird spike in Wh/Mile at the lowest speeds.

Screenshot 2026-03-20 at 09.56.50.webp
Screenshot 2026-03-20 at 09.56.45.webp
Thanks for sharing your data!

It is surprising the efficiency curves meet at 75-80. Maybe that is because air resistance in other areas becomes so significant the topper benefit is overwhelmed.

It is too bad this isn't available anymore. They put a lot of effort into building it, and I am still interested in getting one if they decide to start back up.
 

josh0

Well-Known Member
First Name
Josh
Joined
Jan 4, 2024
Threads
26
Messages
362
Reaction score
508
Location
Abiquiu, NM / Baltimore, MD
Vehicles
2023 (Nov) R1T, 2014 Jeep Cherokee
Thanks for sharing your data!

It is surprising the efficiency curves meet at 75-80. Maybe that is because air resistance in other areas becomes so significant the topper benefit is overwhelmed.

It is too bad this isn't available anymore. They put a lot of effort into building it, and I am still interested in getting one if they decide to start back up.
I’ve gotten a ton of positive responses to it and questions about it from other Rivian owners, and even people driving ICE trucks (huh, that’s a bit loaded now…). When I was just in the Glen Burnie, MD service center, all the guys there like it, too, and expressed surprise that they’d shut down because they thought my had some sort of official blessing from Rivian.

Hopefully they do come back. The comments I got at the service center make me wonder if it’s not that they went out of business, but maybe that they got bought (possibly by Rivian themselves), or at least their designs were?
Sponsored

 
 








Top