rpmtexas
Well-Known Member
It’s all scenarios. Covering the break eliminates two physiological reactions and their associated time without breaking. I’d estimate 1/2 second. You cannot do it in a Rivian. If you lift, regen kicks in and “brakes.”Rivians have collision mitigation braking which will kick in and actively reduce speed if you are not in order to reduce impact - in the case of a vehicle on vehicle collision. The vehicle itself is always actively "covering the brake" - so let's not ignore this feature in the conversation.
Vehicle to child? Are we talking at surface street/neighborhood speeds or highway speeds?
Because if you're going over 15-20mph on a street where a child can run/ride out in front of you the problem is that. If you have any time to react - assuming 1-2s - then ANY braking at all is going to greatly reduce the impact - because almost any vehicle can brake from 15mph to 5 or less rapidly via any deceleration method. At least enough to where there might be injury, but it should be minor if at all.
I'm not trying to debate that physically moving your foot from pedal A to pedal B has latency - of course it does. All I have been saying is deceleration begins the moment you lift off, and if it's a full lift at speed, it's not insignificant deceleration so while you are moving your foot to panic stop on the friction brakes you are actively mitigating impact speed to a degree far greater than you would with a traditional "coast" (ICE or EV with coasting "mapped" in) during the time your foot moves to the brake.
Is that not true? You still get a reduced reaction time to deceleration. Covering the brake, or lifting off at full regen. Both require a single action to begin braking. That's it. Can we agree on that?
Because this is getting utterly asinine
Sponsored