Announcing our new "CLUBS" section where you can join or create a Rivian club or group! You can use this new feature to conveniently plan and discuss local events, gatherings or other club/group related topics.
So we encourage you to join (or start) special-interest and regional-based Rivian clubs at: https://www.rivianforums.com/forum/group-categories/clubs-groups.1/
Average speed dropped as I sat at the light for an extra 2 minutes, but highway speed was steady across the board.I think you are underestimating the impact of slight differences in speed.
A) Ram 2363s with Pirelli AS+3, 2.29 mi/kWh @ 55 MPH average
C) OEM "Staples" with Pirelli AS+3, 2.15 mi/kWh@ 60 MPH average
Wind drag increases with the square of the speed.
5MPH may not seem like a lot. But it is. Wind drag is 60^2 / 55^2 = 1.19x more at 60MPH than 55MPH. You are going 9% faster, but there is 19% more wind drag.
By my math, if you got 2.15 at 55MPH, you would expect 2.15 * 60/55 = 2.35 at 60MPH if 100% of your energy was going to wind drag which is very similar to what you got at 60MPH in the Ram wheels.
Based on your data, I would give the OEM wheels the win.
You can run at the same time against the OE setup if you meet up with one of us on the east side of the Sound. No need to remove tires or wheels.FWIW, 2363 AT and OEM AS were hours apart. Ran the loop, had dinner, changed tires, ran it again.
Ugh y'all are gonna make me do it again?! Killing me!
Douglas Fur (heh, I like that spelling better) supervised wheel changes but did not ride along for any.
Ram AS had 2773 miles
Ram AT had 7500 miles
OEM AS had 6300 miles
![]()
No, I wasn't that sciencey in my loops. I controlled as many factors as possible, but alas, there's always something...Do you know temp, air density, and wind speed/direction for all tests? Without that info the numbers can’t be compared, my data indicates a 0.1 MPK drop between 55 and 60 mph (OEM 20” Rim).
Again, I monitored trip meter info (average speed, total energy, etc etc etc) during stops. Only speed and duration changed, HVAC use seemed minimal.If anything, being stopped longer would have used more energy from HVAC and computers, etc.
My point was just that the highest efficiency run was also stopped longer. So, given the same speeds while driving, it should have used a tiny bit more energy causing it to be less efficient. It implies more evidence that the RAM wheels are more efficient.Again, I monitored trip meter info (average speed, total energy, etc etc etc) during stops. Only speed and duration changed, HVAC use seemed minimal.