ak-bos
Member
Very informative, thank you! Although I think my biggest takeaway was more about how different the entire experience is in San Diego than New England.I would start out saying, I'm in San Diego, CA and have had the vehicle (R1S Dual on 21's with Aero Covers on) for <2 years. Our temperature is fairly consistent throughout the years. I don't know how much temperature affects it, but I figured I'd put it out there.
Driving about 55-60% highway, 40-45% city. On highway, mostly cruising from 75-80 mph. I wouldn't say I have a lead foot, but I'll definitely punch it every now and then to pass someone.
I've made no difference in my driving habits or driving highway/city since the tire change. But here's where I'm at.
The patterns do make the tire look "more aggressive", but it's still an ordinary all-season/highway tire. I would say these tires are quieter, plushier, rides well compare to the originals. Pretty comfy I would say.
Original Set of Tires (Original Pirellis):
33,500 miles over 13,684 kWh = averaging 2.45 mi/kWh
New Set of Tires (Hankook iON HT):
744 miles over 352 kWh = averaging 2.11 mi/kWh
Looking at it, it appears to be a 15% efficiency loss.
Based on quick math, if I compare the same 33,500 miles at 2.11 mi/kWh, I would require 2,192 kWh more than the Original Pirellis. And since I normally charge at night (Super Off Peak) at about $0.10/kWh, appears to be ~$220. So I guess if I double it to 67,000 miles for life of the tires, then maybe about ~$440.
With Hankook @ $235/tire (Price Matched with Mavis) vs Michelin Defender @ $392/tire (Discount Tire), not considering any rebates, I might end up slightly ahead. But at $282-296/tire, the Defender with rebates is definitely worth considering.
Just my two cents. Hope that helps!
I probably don't nerd out over tire efficiency as much, specifically. But energy consumption and efficiency in general is anOk.... if 20 people in the country nerd out over tires and their efficiency impacts more than me, I'd love to meet them.
To keep it short: New tires are about 10 to 15% less efficient than worn tires. The last 10,000 miles of tire life on the old tires are going to be substantially more efficient than the first 10,000 miles of your new tires. Basically, you went from one extreme to the next.
Judge these based on the full life of the tires.
I have the Hankook 21's BTW.
Sponsored