mini2nut
Well-Known Member
Fixed my typo!But not nearly as hefty a premium as the elusive and mysterious Orange Coast interior:
![]()
Sponsored
Fixed my typo!But not nearly as hefty a premium as the elusive and mysterious Orange Coast interior:
![]()
You're absolutely right. I just don't think many here are looking at the Dual Motor range increase alone.I don't see 22%. The max pack on AT improves 35 miles, from 300 to 335
I was just messing aroundFixed my typo!
No worries! I’m surprised my OCD personality didn’t catch it.You're absolutely right. I just don't think many here are looking at the Dual Motor range increase alone.
It's definitely confusing to run through all these options. Dual Motor + Large pack for pre 3/1 is $1500 less for 26 more miles, slower acceleration, and diminished off-road capability.
Probably best all us early preorders just make a final decision, get the vehicle we want at this relatively incredible pricing, and let Rivian move towards profitability with updated pricing for newer customers.
I was just messing aroundI used to have an orange car and love an orange interior
![]()
![]()
Early pricing gave me the Performance Dual AWD Motor at 2.5k.Wow. Buyers who choose the Max Pack will be paying a hefty premium.
I noticed the 260+ mile “standard” pack wasn’t listed.
I went to the website and the “Performance“ Dual Motor will run you $5,000. Its only 1-second faster than the Dual Motor. I don’t see a lot of buyers checking this option box. It’s a super expensive option for a minimal performance gain.
Is the limit for the tax credit still guaranteed 80k or less?Looks like I'll be sticking with the one and only large-pack configuration that will have any sort of tax benefit... Silver, dual-motor, large pack, 21" road.
This shall henceforth be known as the "IRS Edition."
My numbers are based on the Configurator, which shows...I don't see 22%. The max pack on AT improves 35 miles, from 300 to 335
That’s correct. One must compare dual motors with max pack to dual motors without max pack. Max pack gives you an increase of only 11%. It’s so tiny I don’t think they’re adding a Taycan-like second gear after all. That would have been rad.I don't see 22%. The max pack on AT improves 35 miles, from 300 to 335
Large Pack + Dual Motor + AT = 300 milesMy numbers are based on the Configurator, which shows...
Quad Motor, Large Battery, 20" AT wheels: Range 274
Dual Motor, Max Batter, 20" AT wheels: Range 335
335 - 274 = 61
61/274 = 22%
Quad Motor Large Battery Configurator
![]()
![]()
Dual Motor Max Battery Configurator
![]()
![]()
Has Rivian disclosed that the max pack will be LFP? LFP energy density is usually much worse. It’s all around much worse, actually, except for cost.I'll bet their in-house gigafactory will focus on the max pack LFP chemistry then design a regular and max pack around that and part ways with the large pack cell supplier.
Are most not able to eek out ~300 miles w/their quad running 20" wheels, not in the winter of course...More chart visuals to help you assess the impact based on Wheel Selection.
In my opinion, going from Quad Large to Dual Max is worthwhile - 20% is significant.
![]()
Yes not as good but will be daily at 100% instead of 85%Has Rivian disclosed that the max pack will be LFP? LFP energy density is usually much worse. It’s all around much worse, actually, except for cost.
Yes I would like to know if it is LFP as well. Less energy dense but can take 100% charging and deeper discharge as well.Yes not as good but will be daily at 100% instead of 85%
Only standard pack is going to be LFP.Yes I would like to know if it is LFP as well. Less energy dense but can take 100% charging and deeper discharge as well.