That UI would look a LOT better if the maps used satellite images. It looks way too bland and monotone IMO and has a ton of wasted space.Just saw your quoted thread lol. Looking at that UI though ??
I’m thinking we could change that setting to use satellite images on the iPhone. It’s also good to have a balance between other controls and maps in one screen. It would be one less tap to skip the music and etc.That UI would look a LOT better if the maps used satellite images. It looks way too bland and monotone IMO and has a ton of wasted space.
Routing direction UI while driving is the main reason I've switched to using Apple Maps over Google Maps. Apple Maps' less cluttered interface, larger routing instructions, and clearer travel route indicator make it much easier to follow in unfamiliar places, IMO. Eye candy and clutter may look cool in a screenshot but just get in the way when you need to quickly parse and assimilate information.That UI would look a LOT better if the maps used satellite images. It looks way too bland and monotone IMO and has a ton of wasted space.
”Quickly parse” what the English call safe overtaking.Routing direction UI while driving is the main reason I've switched to using Apple Maps over Google Maps. Apple Maps' less cluttered interface, larger routing instructions, and clearer travel route indicator make it much easier to follow in unfamiliar places, IMO. Eye candy and clutter may look cool in a screenshot but just get in the way when you need to quickly parse and assimilate information.
My favorite thing Apple Maps does is the haptic buzz from my Apple Watch when I come up to a turn in the directions. I find I don’t have to look at the screen as often and I don’t need to have the audio prompts turned on either.Routing direction UI while driving is the main reason I've switched to using Apple Maps over Google Maps. Apple Maps' less cluttered interface, larger routing instructions, and clearer travel route indicator make it much easier to follow in unfamiliar places, IMO. Eye candy and clutter may look cool in a screenshot but just get in the way when you need to quickly parse and assimilate information.
That went over my head, whatever it was supposed to be...”Quickly parse” what the English call safe overtaking.
The British often add an 'r' sound where it doesn't belong, like Bostonians do. So "wash" becomes "warsh" and "pass" becomes "parse." It's a play on words since both are actual words.That went over my head, whatever it was supposed to be...
Nah, the Boston accent and Received Pronunciation are both "non rhotic" in that "r" is generally dropped before a word-ending consonant sound, not added. Someone from Boston would pronounce "parse" as "pass" (or really "pahse") but would not add an r into pass to make it sound like parse. (We do sometimes add a "linking r" to the end of a word like idea->idear, tuna->tunar)The British often add an 'r' sound where it doesn't belong, like Bostonians do. So "wash" becomes "warsh" and "pass" becomes "parse." It's a play on words since both are actual words.
Just the English, not the British but good job avoiding being an arse with your reply ?The British often add an 'r' sound where it doesn't belong, like Bostonians do. So "wash" becomes "warsh" and "pass" becomes "parse." It's a play on words since both are actual words.
I applaud anyone who tries to learn English as a second language. I did not appreciate how whacked English is until I started studying Japanese.Dunno, it might be like the Asian L and R thing, where to them they think they say it, to us it sounds like they do BOTH add and drop them. …
A ton of wasted space? It’s like Apple consulted Rivian.That UI would look a LOT better if the maps used satellite images. It looks way too bland and monotone IMO and has a ton of wasted space.
