Search results

Yep. If anything the updated S-1 confirms what most of us have been saying all along.

It's an indicator to me. That's a fact, not an assumption. If they don't hit this deadline it INDICATES to ME that there's something truly amiss at Rivian. It indicates to ME, that I should increase my level of concern about LE delivery dates. I'm not worked up. You asked a question, and I...

Because it's an indicator of whether or not the company is on track, or another delay is imminent (official or unofficial). There's 30+ guides sitting around twiddling their thumbs right now. If they can't even meet the deadline of reaching out by Thanksgiving, then it's just one more clear...

It's one thing to miss the deadline. But I think it's completely unacceptable to set a delivery date, and then never update the customer that they're not going to make that date, while the customer is anxiously awaiting the whole month. Terrible. What is even the point of having a guide, if...

That's just fucking terrible customer service . Rivian should be ashamed

The results are in, and everyone is correct.

This is how you do first deliveries…to real customers. https://insideevs.com/news/544466/lucid-air-dream-edition-rally/

I think we’ve officially run out of things to complain about.

I’m old and grumpy. I scream at almost anything that moves. Sometimes I also shake my fist at it.

Definitely ebbs and flows. I find its directly correlated to how much new info/updates/anything is coming out of Rivian.

I agree with almost everything you wrote. But not the above. We’ve been reminded many times that Rivian does indeed monitor these forums (they’d be crazy not to). I think it’s ridiculous when forum members who express an opinion that someone doesn’t like are told to cancel their order and go...

So very trite. I know it can be hard to believe, but it is possible to be disappointed with one facet of a company (say…communication) while still wanting to support the product or the company as a whole.

Bloomberg is wrong, which isn't a huge surprise. Anyone can go and read yesterday's plan to see for themselves the limits that have been proposed.

I'm guessing it's in reference to that silvery part near the front of the vehicle, not the area protecting the batteries.

@Administrator : Can we get the title of this thread updated so as to not mislead people who don't read through it? The proposed plan is most certainly not making R1S a better deal.

Still wrong. The framework clearly spells it out, and was published this afternoon.

A little harsh, but I get your point and you are technically correct. We all need to wait and see how the final rules are written, and how Rivian responds with any changes to their pricing to adapt to those rules. What we know is that the current lowest price R1S falls above the MSRP...

Like I said, not trying to be mean. Just wanted to correct misinformation before it spread. The R1S doesn't qualify because its MSRP is greater than $69,000 These are the price limits established in today's bill:

Nope. Read today's bill and see for yourself.

Correct. Max pack just became a $17,500 option.