WolfpackFX4
Member
Much appreciated here
Sponsored
-
Announcing our new "CLUBS" section where you can join or create a Rivian club or group! You can use this new feature to conveniently plan and discuss local events, gatherings or other club/group related topics.
So we encourage you to join (or start) special-interest and regional-based Rivian clubs at: https://www.rivianforums.com/forum/group-categories/clubs-groups.1/
Sponsored
Affordable high efficiency 20" wheels and 33" tires options (275/60R20)
LL75
Well-Known Member
| 8 Drives |
| Total Miles Driven | 45.06 |
| Rated Miles Used | 45.98 |
| Efficiency | 98 % |
| Time Driven | 1 Hours 8 Minutes |
| kWh Used | 16.69 kWh |
All purpose driving. By far the best efficiency since I got the general grabbers HTS60. As the weather is warming up to around 80 degree, and with around 2K miles on the tires, I see the efficiency slowly creeping up as well.
aznkukuboi
Active Member
- First Name
- Michael
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2024
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 32
- Reaction score
- 11
- Location
- Bakersfield
- Vehicles
- R1T
275/60/20 is "basically" the same without needing to get Rivian to recalibrate (or whatever the term is to swap the readout for wheel size change. I think it's 0.3% difference, which is negligible in real world.
TheIglu
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Clayton
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2022
- Threads
- 23
- Messages
- 334
- Reaction score
- 454
- Location
- North Central MA
- Vehicles
- 2022 Rivian R1T
- Occupation
- IT
With my stock 21's, I'm seeing 2.53mi/kWh on the trip meter over a 2500 mile dataset.
Can I expect that level of efficiency with these 20" options? Such as the General Grabber HTS60?
Can I expect that level of efficiency with these 20" options? Such as the General Grabber HTS60?
LL75
Well-Known Member
Yes. I'm currently getting about the same efficiency with the general grabbers HTS60 compared to my 21". The grabbers is very sticky at first so the first 500 miles or so is lower than that.
Sponsored
Riviot
Well-Known Member
I got about the same with my Pirelli AS+3 on Ram 2363 wheels. I really gotta do the efficiency comparison on these wheels compared to stock 20" wheels... Too many other projects!
8 Drives Total Miles Driven 45.06 Rated Miles Used 45.98 Efficiency 98 % Time Driven 1
Hours
8
MinuteskWh Used 16.69 kWh
All purpose driving. By far the best efficiency since I got the general grabbers HTS60. As the weather is warming up to around 80 degree, and with around 2K miles on the tires, I see the efficiency slowly creeping up as well.
Condor
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- CJ
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2021
- Threads
- 5
- Messages
- 72
- Reaction score
- 53
- Location
- Cincinnati, OH
- Vehicles
- Tesla Model 3, Rivian R1S
Thoughts on these tires compared to the new Yokohama Geolandar CV 4S?
I think I’ve narrowed my choices down to the General and the Yokohama but I’m having trouble deciding…
I like that the Yoko has the proper ratings, will probably last longer and will likely handle snow/ice better. But I like that the General is wider and lighter…
I want better efficiency than the stock ATs but more importantly I want the best ride and handling experience.
I appreciate any advice, thanks
I think I’ve narrowed my choices down to the General and the Yokohama but I’m having trouble deciding…
I like that the Yoko has the proper ratings, will probably last longer and will likely handle snow/ice better. But I like that the General is wider and lighter…
I want better efficiency than the stock ATs but more importantly I want the best ride and handling experience.
I appreciate any advice, thanks
OP
OP
ksurfier
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #174
three-four factors to consider:
- Tread depth 10/32 for HTS60 vs 13/32 for CV4S
- UTQG - Slightly better for CV4S
- Snow rating - only CV4S
- looks - CV4S wins there
I went with the CV4S based on the first two factors, specially UTQG, but I do believe the HTS60 is slightly more efficient…
Sounds like you’d be well suited with the CV4S, unless efficiency is your #1 target…
Pacblue22
Active Member
Starting to look as well...does the Yokohama come in the appropriate size?
https://www.tirerack.com/tires/yokohama-geolandar-cv-4s
I was kind of defaulting to Michelin LTX M/S2 just because of popularity/name....so not really super metric based...
https://www.tirerack.com/tires/yokohama-geolandar-cv-4s
I was kind of defaulting to Michelin LTX M/S2 just because of popularity/name....so not really super metric based...
Sponsored
LL75
Well-Known Member
I have about 3500 miles on the general grabber now and yesterday has been the best efficiency by far. This month of may is averaging around 2.65 kwh. All purpose mode driving
|
| 6 Drives |
| Total Miles Driven | 52.08 |
| Rated Miles Used | 50.33 |
| Efficiency | 103.47 % |
| Time Driven | 1 Hours 11 Minutes |
| kWh Used | 18.27 kWh |
| Wh/Mile | 351 Wh |
| Battery | 16.09% |
| Cost | $ 2.28 |
| Average Temp | 87.34 F |
SSteveEV
Well-Known Member
Has anyone with the General Grabber HTS60 found the tread pattern to toss you side to side a bit on longitudinal grooved concrete highways?
I'm happy overall except for highway cruising which was a large part of why I switched to these. (cruising at 70-80mph)
I'm happy overall except for highway cruising which was a large part of why I switched to these. (cruising at 70-80mph)
HyperionMark
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Mark
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2022
- Threads
- 5
- Messages
- 210
- Reaction score
- 201
- Location
- South Dakota
- Vehicles
- R1T and Model Y (previously a 3 and X)
Highly grooved highways like that will throw around quite a few tread patterns regardless of vehicle or weight. I would only worry about that unless you drive many miles of them every single day.
SSteveEV
Well-Known Member
a little over a 100 mile round trip commute for me these days but thankfully its not all on that route. Last night I got tossed around in Canada too. Its not terrible but it is a downside.
Upside is I got 3.0mi/kWh on a very flat highway in low conserve, yay!
Sponsored
