Sponsored

Has your efficiency notably changed with the latest update (2025.10)?


  • Total voters
    132

2kwik4u

Well-Known Member
First Name
Michael
Joined
Jan 8, 2025
Threads
11
Messages
827
Reaction score
1,076
Location
Western NY State
Vehicles
2024 Rivian R1T ; 2018 Nissan Rogue
Just did a shade over 1,200mi this weekend. Reset the trip meter leaving the house. 533mi down to KY, 533-ish back. Lots of around town/mixed use driving in between. Global average was 2.0mi/kWh for the trip. Global average over the life of the truck (just over 13k miles now) is 1.9mi/kWh. SO, not much of a change for me.

Did finally get hot enough to kick on the fans while fast charging, and the A/C compressor finally ran at full tilt pulling away. Holy balls the truck is loud when everything is trying to cool back down.
Sponsored

 

Hopper

Well-Known Member
First Name
Richard
Joined
Feb 20, 2021
Threads
27
Messages
397
Reaction score
350
Location
Upstate New York
Vehicles
Launch Green R1T, 2022 Polaris Ranger NorthStar
Occupation
Retired Executive and technical writer. Board of Directors Fly Fishers International.
As has been briefly mentioned in this thread: https://www.rivianforums.com/forum/threads/2025-10-update-now-installing.42932/post-768782

I'm seeing a pretty substantial efficiency boost out of nowhere.
[For context, I drive ~144 miles round trip for work. Due to highway speeds driving, as well as elevation changes, and how cold it is in the morning--I start my drive in around 0500--my TYPICAL SoC usage driving in on my nATs is ~35%. Today it was 25%. GRANTED, it's 20F warmer than it has been this past winter, this morning: I was seeing my thermometer read 61F, and last week during my drive in, it was all of 45F. But there's almost no way that a 40% improvement on efficiency is ONLY due to the weather, in my experience. Further, I typically see ~1.5-1.8 mi/kWh on the nATs at highway speeds. This morning I was well over 2.0 the entire trip. I don't recall, even on the warmest weather days, ever seeing that kind of highway efficiency with my nATs.]


I'm simply posting this to see if anyone else is having the same experience. Has 2025.10 made any considerable differences in your mi/kWh or your overall SoC usage for your typically driving?

If this isn't an anomaly for those of us seeing it, this is pretty incredible. Hopefully this isn't an isolated experience!

Discuss!
Please
 

Bar_Down

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tom
Joined
May 18, 2020
Threads
0
Messages
58
Reaction score
74
Location
DC
Vehicles
Chevy Suburban
Occupation
Finance
Clubs
 
To be clear.
I have had my truck for over 2 years.
I know it pretty well.

40% improvement in efficiency is absolutely not just due to the modest temperature adjustment.
ESPECIALLY when you figure my battery temps are typically in the 'comfort zone' as my truck is parked in a heated garage.

Thanks for playing!
I thought it must have been the weather, but I don’t recall the same % improvement last spring. Happy to see it whatever the reason.
 

Engineer

Well-Known Member
First Name
Justin
Joined
Aug 25, 2023
Threads
9
Messages
152
Reaction score
243
Location
NC
Vehicles
'23 R1S QM Adventure, UnderShield, Megawatt sliders, and 20" Darks
Occupation
Engineer
Clubs
 
these pics were taken at the same time. I’m not sure either are right but who knows.
Rivian R1T R1S Efficiency boost from 2025.10 update? Anyone else seeing this? IMG_5014
Rivian R1T R1S Efficiency boost from 2025.10 update? Anyone else seeing this? IMG_5013
 

Singletracker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2022
Threads
39
Messages
1,305
Reaction score
1,276
Location
NV
Vehicles
2023 R1T QM w/20” A/T’s
I’m still trying to figure why on earth anybody attaches any relevance to the driver’s display efficiency graph. It is not a reliable indicator of any longer distance driving efficiency. It’s a snapshot in time, only. Mine regularly goes up to 4 m/kWh. In the grand scheme of things, it doesn’t mean a darn thing. I honestly don’t know why it is even there.
Sponsored

 
 








Top