Sponsored

L1 faster than it was before the latest software update?

Count Orlok

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 17, 2022
Threads
185
Messages
2,587
Reaction score
5,436
Location
Wisconsin & New Mexico
Vehicles
2022 R1S/ 2024 INEOS Grenadier/ 1969 Ford / etc.
Occupation
retired
Clubs
 
I'm still waiting for my L2 installation but I noticed I'm getting a lot more charge added per hour than when I first got my R1S. I was getting 45 miles per day but the rate seems to have increased. It's been charging for the past 24 hours and supposedly added 66 miles; nothing else has changed... same outlet/circuit and charging in a 50 degree garage while the S is off and locked. Perhaps the software update put a wooden stake through the vampire's heart?
Sponsored

 

brancky3

Well-Known Member
First Name
Brandon
Joined
Feb 11, 2022
Threads
7
Messages
727
Reaction score
858
Location
Greenville, SC
Vehicles
22 CY R1T, 21 MachE GT
Occupation
IT
I'm still waiting for my L2 installation but I noticed I'm getting a lot more charge added per hour than when I first got my R1S. I was getting 45 miles per day but the rate seems to have increased. It's been charging for the past 24 hours and supposedly added 66 miles; nothing else has changed... same outlet/circuit and charging in a 50 degree garage while the S is off and locked. Perhaps the software update put a wooden stake through the vampire's heart?
Wow 66 miles isn’t bad at all! I wouldn’t expect more than 2 miles per hour personally.
 

jebinc

Well-Known Member
First Name
John
Joined
Oct 5, 2022
Threads
49
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
2,134
Location
Seattle, WA
Vehicles
2021+ Tesla MS Plaid, R1T Adventure
Occupation
Retired
There’s only so much power you can extract from a 120v L1 feed. No free power.
 
OP
OP
Count Orlok

Count Orlok

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 17, 2022
Threads
185
Messages
2,587
Reaction score
5,436
Location
Wisconsin & New Mexico
Vehicles
2022 R1S/ 2024 INEOS Grenadier/ 1969 Ford / etc.
Occupation
retired
Clubs
 
There’s only so much power you can extract from a 120v L1 feed. No free power.
I didn't say otherwise. I was wondering if the S is making better use of the trickle than before. Or, it could be the "miles added" estimate is FUBAR after the last update.
 

racekarl

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2023
Threads
9
Messages
583
Reaction score
888
Location
MA
Vehicles
2023 R1T
Measuring charge rate in ā€œmiles per hourā€ or miles added is not going to give you a reliable metric. The range estimate your car gives you is based on your consumption behavior and is generally backward looking. That is, you may have driven conservatively before this more recent charge and the vehicle is guessing you can go 66 miles on an amount of energy that it previously thought would only take you 45 miles.

The only reliable way to compare charge sessions is to measure the total kWh added and the time spent charging.
 

Sponsored

GZR1S

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 8, 2022
Threads
2
Messages
48
Reaction score
69
Location
Las vegas
Vehicles
MYP
I'm still waiting for my L2 installation but I noticed I'm getting a lot more charge added per hour than when I first got my R1S. I was getting 45 miles per day but the rate seems to have increased. It's been charging for the past 24 hours and supposedly added 66 miles; nothing else has changed... same outlet/circuit and charging in a 50 degree garage while the S is off and locked. Perhaps the software update put a wooden stake through the vampire's heart?
Hopefully it’s because of less vampire drain from the update
 
OP
OP
Count Orlok

Count Orlok

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 17, 2022
Threads
185
Messages
2,587
Reaction score
5,436
Location
Wisconsin & New Mexico
Vehicles
2022 R1S/ 2024 INEOS Grenadier/ 1969 Ford / etc.
Occupation
retired
Clubs
 
Measuring charge rate in ā€œmiles per hourā€ or miles added is not going to give you a reliable metric. The range estimate your car gives you is based on your consumption behavior and is generally backward looking. That is, you may have driven conservatively before this more recent charge and the vehicle is guessing you can go 66 miles on an amount of energy that it previously thought would only take you 45 miles.

The only reliable way to compare charge sessions is to measure the total kWh added and the time spent charging.
totally makes sense that my driving pattern would impact the estimate. thanks!
 

whyasky

Well-Known Member
First Name
Yury
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Threads
6
Messages
247
Reaction score
447
Location
Mid-Atlantic
Vehicles
R1T, ID.4
Measuring charge rate in ā€œmiles per hourā€ or miles added is not going to give you a reliable metric. The range estimate your car gives you is based on your consumption behavior and is generally backward looking. That is, you may have driven conservatively before this more recent charge and the vehicle is guessing you can go 66 miles on an amount of energy that it previously thought would only take you 45 miles.

The only reliable way to compare charge sessions is to measure the total kWh added and the time spent charging.
While true for some other evs, this is not true for the Rivian. My truck has made no adjustments to the range estimate in the 3500mi I've put on it. Rivian will give you a better estimate in the navigation view to a specific destination, but the range in the energy screen or bottom right of driver's screen always reads something very close to the epa estimate. So 66mi is probably right around 31-32kwh of charge.

Edit: My ID.4 is the exact opposite. Estimate completely predicated on previous use case, generally not useful forward looking information.
Sponsored

 
 








Top